- #36
Yashbhatt
- 348
- 13
phinds said:I agree w/ you.
"likes" used to be "thanks" and was, I believe, much more indicative of reputation for helpfulness but Greg decided he wanted to be more like Facebook so changed it to "like".
For example, I've got a whole ton of "likes" but that's just because I make smart ass remarks that are sometimes funny whereas the people here who really know what they are talking about and are very helpful in providing solid answers don't always get as much credit as they deserve. I argued w/ Greg about that change when it happened but I lost. I doubt if he's going to re-open that whole can of worms for you.
Deciding what "reputation" is and how it gets determined is a tricky and touchy subject, so I can't entirely blame Greg* for not wanting to complicate it.
* Actually, I COULD blame him but he's a nice guy so I don't
I get your point. But I feel likes or upvotes are a good way to measure because if someone writes something correct and insightful, he/she will get his share of upvotes.(After all this is a physics community and people will definitely like good answers better than kickass replies.)