MHB 232.5a Evaluate the double integral

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{232.5a}\\
\textsf{Evaluate the double integral}$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
I_a&=\iint\limits_{R} xy\sqrt{x^2+y^2} \, dA \\
R&=[0,2]\times[-1,1]
\end{align*}
Ok, just want to see if I made the first step correct.
this looks like simply a rectangle so x and y are basically interchangeable
\begin{align*}
&=\int_{-1}^{1} \int_{0}^{2} xy\sqrt{x^2+y^2} \,dx \,dy
\end{align*}
however the next step looks kinda daunting:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about the substitution $x=y\tan\theta$?
 
greg1313 said:
How about the substitution $x=y\tan\theta$?

are you suggesting that

\begin{align*}
&=\int_{-1}^{1} \int_{a}^{b} y^2\tan\theta \, \sqrt{y^2\tan^2\theta+y^2} \,d\theta \,dy
\end{align*}

not sure what a and b would be on the limits
 
karush said:
$\tiny{232.5a}\\
\textsf{Evaluate the double integral}$
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
I_a&=\iint\limits_{R} xy\sqrt{x^2+y^2} \, dA \\
R&=[0,2]\times[-1,1]
\end{align*}
Ok, just want to see if I made the first step correct.
this looks like simply a rectangle so x and y are basically interchangeable
\begin{align*}
&=\int_{-1}^{1} \int_{0}^{2} xy\sqrt{x^2+y^2} \,dx \,dy
\end{align*}
however the next step looks kinda daunting:confused:

Ummm... No. Do an experiment for me. Take x = 2 and evaluate the single integral. Then, back up and take x = 1 and evaluate the single integral. See if you notice something. This is an eyeball problem.

Definition: "Eyeball Problem" - Just look at it and call out the answer before your neighbor beats you to it.
 
that is giving me a headache

I presume you mean separate x and y
 
karush said:
that is giving me a headache

I presume you mean separate x and y

No, I mean just pick x = 2 and then ignore that x exists and ignore the inner integral.

$\int\limits_{-1}^{1}2y\sqrt{4+y^2}\;dy$

What do you get?

Now, x = 1.

$\int\limits_{-1}^{1}y\sqrt{1+y^2}\;dy$

What do you get?
 
Last edited:
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...

Similar threads

Back
Top