3 Mil Jobs lost to China are returning to the U.S.

In summary, the conversation discussed the trend of jobs returning to the U.S. from China, citing reasons such as rising Chinese wages, American productivity, and no overseas shipping charges. However, some argued that the video report may be overly optimistic and that there are other factors at play, such as logistics and currency pegging. There were also speculations about potential motives for punishing China and the impact of the financial crisis on the availability of funds for building factories. Overall, opinions were divided on the extent and sustainability of this job shift.
  • #1
DoggerDan
Link to news article: http://news.yahoo.com/video/us-15749625/overseas-jobs-come-home-26850542.html

Out of an estimated 4.5 million jobs lost to China over the last few decades, upwards of 3 million are returning to the U.S. Cited factors include rapidly-rising Chinese wages, American productivity, and no overseas shipping charges.

I recall the video saying that American workers can produce up to 4x as much as their Chinese counterparts, but I think most of that is due to performance-enhancing manufacturing technology, rather than inherent productivity for each individual.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
  • #3
Proton Soup said:
that's funny, because they're also making noise again about china's currency manipulation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/07/b...-punish-china-over-currency-manipulation.html

so what happened? could it be that our dollar has become so devalued wrt the chinese currency that the problem has "self-corrected"? and won't punishing china now just push the situation even more back in our favor?

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't China peg the yuan to the dollar?
 
  • #4
Proton Soup said:
so what happened? could it be that our dollar has become so devalued wrt the chinese currency that the problem has "self-corrected"? and won't punishing china now just push the situation even more back in our favor?

I've found most things in life are self-correcting and will find a new balance point when you leave well enough alone. Obviously, you wouldn't want to take that approach to your dirty dishes, but the video article mentioned China's prosperity resulted in increasing wages, which is a large factor in the shift back towards domestic jobs, much the same as high U.S. wages originally caused the trend to offshore and overseas manufacturing.
 
  • #6
DoggerDan said:
Link to news article: http://news.yahoo.com/video/us-15749625/overseas-jobs-come-home-26850542.html

Out of an estimated 4.5 million jobs lost to China over the last few decades, upwards of 3 million are returning to the U.S. Cited factors include rapidly-rising Chinese wages, American productivity, and no overseas shipping charges.

I recall the video saying that American workers can produce up to 4x as much as their Chinese counterparts, but I think most of that is due to performance-enhancing manufacturing technology, rather than inherent productivity for each individual.

The video report seems a tad optomistic on some areas. Upwards of 3 million are returning to the U.S - that is a projection not a fact, and in what time frame, 1 year, 10 years. And as for overseas shipping charges - that is miniscule compared to distribution costs to individual stores in addition to highway transportation costs from the manufacturing plant to distribution center.


I would bet that logistics has a part to play here also for certain goods and certainly not all. What the video report does not mention that there is no border to cross, and subsequently no customs clearance delays if your shipment of goods gets flagged to be checked at import. Time factors and secure delivery are not mentioned.

The written report is most likely more compehensive. News bites keep people watching.

I close one eye at financial and economic reports such as this. Next week another report will come out that 2 million jobs are being lost oversea due to some other factor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
256bits said:
The video report seems a tad optomistic on some areas. Upwards of 3 million are returning to the U.S - that is a projection not a fact, and in what time frame, 1 year, 10 years.

I know. Not clear. An economist friend says "4 years for parity."

We'll see.
 
  • #9
DoggerDan said:
I've found most things in life are self-correcting and will find a new balance point when you leave well enough alone. Obviously, you wouldn't want to take that approach to your dirty dishes, but the video article mentioned China's prosperity resulted in increasing wages, which is a large factor in the shift back towards domestic jobs, much the same as high U.S. wages originally caused the trend to offshore and overseas manufacturing.

thing is, though, it seems like they're just piling on, now. the imbalance is correcting, but there is this extra incentive now to actually punish china. why is that? what has china done to deserve getting a double whammy? one possibility is that they've done nothing, but this is just politicians getting scared of where the US economy is going, so let's start an economic war for our own benefit.

or maybe it's something else? like maybe retaliation for china trying to move in on our turf and http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/05/27/chinas_port_in_pakistan" on assets we've spilt blood over?

what else could this be about?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
I believe the transportation cost, but not the wages argument. Enormous amounts of China are still that much underdeveloped that it should be easy to build factories.

This effect probably, IMO, has more to do with that I expect money has become more expensive. With the financial crisis and the local debts, getting the money to build factories must have become more difficult.

It will probably just blow over. The capacity of the Chinese is just too large to see any real competitive rise in wages any time soon.
 
  • #11
256bits said:
The video report seems a tad optomistic on some areas. Upwards of 3 million are returning to the U.S - that is a projection not a fact, and in what time frame, 1 year, 10 years. And as for overseas shipping charges - that is miniscule compared to distribution costs to individual stores in addition to highway transportation costs from the manufacturing plant to distribution center.


I would bet that logistics has a part to play here also for certain goods and certainly not all. What the video report does not mention that there is no border to cross, and subsequently no customs clearance delays if your shipment of goods gets flagged to be checked at import. Time factors and secure delivery are not mentioned.

The written report is most likely more compehensive. News bites keep people watching.

I close one eye at financial and economic reports such as this. Next week another report will come out that 2 million jobs are being lost oversea due to some other factor.

Sound objections. I'll just add that, in spite of the low cost of international shipping, it does entail some logistical drawbacks beyond time lag. You need to contract whole 20' or 40' containers to reach proper cost economies, which isn't good for just-in-time inventory in many cases. Often you'll also need to disemburse full FOB costs (product, shipping and handling, port dues) up front, possibly on a higher unit count than that needed by immediate sales, which is no good for cash flow. In one case I know personally, these two factors combined to require a higher capital need than a third world start-up, financed by a US company, could handle, so the business model became inviable. The product to be imported was made in China; investors are now considering making the units locally.

At any rate, this isn't the first I've heard of goods becoming once again more economical to source in the US. Been happening with cheap plastics for some time, iirc.
 
  • #12
Proton Soup said:
one possibility is that they've done nothing, but this is just politicians getting scared of where the US economy is going, so let's start an economic war for our own benefit.

I think there's more to it than that. As some have mentioned, the U.S. doesn't like it when other countries enact policies which effect our own economy.

or maybe it's something else? like maybe retaliation for china trying to move in on our turf and http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/05/27/chinas_port_in_pakistan" on assets we've spilt blood over?

Could be. Then again, that's mostly our fault for handing them the pink slip to our country.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
DoggerDan said:
I recall the video saying that American workers can produce up to 4x as much as their Chinese counterparts, but I think most of that is due to performance-enhancing manufacturing technology, rather than inherent productivity for each individual.

I am sorry but many Americans do not work all that hard, especially when it comes to manufacturing or agricultural jobs. Look at Alabama and other southern states- farmers have issues getting people who are *willing* to work hard.

This brings up the question whether all our socialistic props like unions, minimum wage, health care negatively influence American productivity. Really, if you want to buy shoes for forty bucks you cannot really make them in the US.
 
  • #14
SunnyBoyNY said:
This brings up the question whether all our socialistic props like unions, minimum wage, health care negatively influence American productivity.

I think that's an excellent question to bring up. It's my observation they do negatively influence American productivity.
 

FAQ: 3 Mil Jobs lost to China are returning to the U.S.

How many jobs are returning to the U.S. from China?

The statement suggests that 3 million jobs are returning to the U.S. from China, but there is no concrete evidence or data to support this claim. It is important to note that job numbers are constantly changing and can be affected by various factors, so it is difficult to determine an exact number of jobs returning from China.

What types of jobs are returning from China to the U.S.?

There is no specific information on the types of jobs that are returning from China to the U.S. The statement is vague and does not specify which industries or sectors are being referred to. It is also important to consider that job types and industries can change over time, so it is difficult to make a generalization about returning jobs from China.

Why are these jobs returning to the U.S.?

Again, there is no clear explanation or evidence to support the claim that jobs are returning from China to the U.S. It is important to be cautious of statements that make broad claims without providing solid evidence or data. Factors such as trade policies, economic conditions, and market trends can all play a role in job numbers and movements.

How will the return of jobs from China impact the U.S. economy?

It is difficult to predict the impact of jobs returning from China on the U.S. economy without concrete data and evidence. While it may be positive to see jobs returning to the U.S., there are also potential consequences such as changes in trade relationships and economic stability. It is important to consider all factors and data before making conclusions about the impact on the economy.

Is this statement backed by scientific research?

As a scientist, it is important to rely on evidence and data to support claims. The statement that 3 million jobs are returning to the U.S. from China does not have any scientific research or data to back it up. It is important to critically evaluate statements and claims, and to seek out reliable and credible sources for information.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top