- #1
Kimchijjigae
Is that true?
The IPCC stands for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. They are a group of scientists who assess the science related to climate change and its impacts. Their conclusion is that human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels, are the main cause of global warming.
The 31,000 U.S. scientists are a group of individuals who signed a petition stating that they do not believe human activities are the main cause of global warming. This petition was organized by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, a group that does not specialize in climate science and has received funding from organizations that deny climate change. The vast majority of these 31,000 individuals do not have expertise in climate science and their views are not supported by the overwhelming majority of scientists who study climate change.
The views of the 31,000 U.S. scientists are in stark contrast to the views of the majority of climate scientists. In fact, a survey of over 12,000 peer-reviewed scientific papers on climate change found that 97% of them agree that human activities are the main cause of global warming. This overwhelming consensus among climate scientists is supported by multiple lines of evidence and has been confirmed by numerous scientific organizations and institutions around the world.
Unfortunately, there are individuals and organizations that have a vested interest in denying the reality of climate change and promoting doubt and confusion among the public. They may use the petition signed by the 31,000 U.S. scientists as a way to cast doubt on the overwhelming consensus among climate scientists. However, it is important to remember that the vast majority of these 31,000 individuals do not have expertise in climate science and their views are not supported by the scientific evidence.
The scientific consensus on climate change is not based on the opinions of a select few individuals, but rather on the overwhelming evidence from multiple scientific disciplines. The 97% consensus among climate scientists, as well as the support from numerous scientific organizations and institutions, demonstrates the strength and credibility of the scientific consensus on climate change. It is important to evaluate the evidence and expertise of those who disagree with the consensus and not give weight to the opinions of a small minority with questionable motivations.