MHB 6.6.63 ln(7-x)+ln(1-x)=ln(25-x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation ln(7-x) + ln(1-x) = ln(25-x) is solved by applying logarithmic rules to combine the left side into a single logarithm. This leads to the equation (7-x)(1-x) = 25-x, which is then expanded and rearranged to form a quadratic equation x^2 - 7x - 18 = 0. Factoring this equation yields the solutions x = 9 and x = -2. However, since the logarithmic functions require x to be less than 1, the valid solution is x = -2. Therefore, the exact solution for x is -2.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny\textbf{6.6.63 Kiliani HS}$
Solve for x give exact form
$\ln{(7-x)}+\ln{(1-x)}=\ln{(25-x)}$

$\begin{array}{rrll}
\textsf{log rules} &(7-x)(1-x) &=25-x \\
\textsf{expand} &7-8x+x^2 &=25-x \\
\textsf{set to zero} &x^2-7x-18 &=0 \\
\textsf{factor} &(x-9)(x+2) &=0 \\
\textsf{zero's} &x&=9, \quad -2 \\
x\le -1\quad\therefore &x&=-2
\end{array}$

I hope...
typo's ?
have to very careful:rolleyes:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
there will be $x \lt 1$ not -1 so $x=-2$ will be the answer
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top