- #1
- 8,447
- 5,600
http://www.iupac.org/news/news-detail/article/discovery-and-assignment-of-elements-with-atomic-numbers-113-115-117-and-118.html
Radon has atomic number 86.newjerseyrunner said:I find it interesting that all the data I've read so far is that 118 is expected to be a slightly reactive solid, not a nobel gas.
Martin0001 said:Radon has atomic number 86.
You need to add 32 protons (2+6+10+14) to get next noble gas.
Hence 118 should be a noble gas.
It might not be a gas but elements of valent shell configuration s2p6 like element 118 or neon and also helium (s2) are called "noble gases".
Martin0001 said:Radon has atomic number 86.
You need to add 32 protons (2+6+10+14) to get next noble gas.
Hence 118 should be a noble gas.
It might not be a gas but elements of valent shell configuration s2p6 like element 118 or neon and also helium (s2) are called "noble gases".
Yeah, from my limited understanding, small atoms are governed entirely by the laws of quantum physics, but the much larger atoms' outer shells start having relativistic effects which change how they behave and react.TeethWhitener said:I think @newjerseyrunner is referring to the prediction of a large spin-orbit coupling in Uuo, leading to a significantly enhanced reactivity. Here's an example calculation from 2005: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp050736o
Is nuclear physics not an application of chemistry?Stephanus said:Can't help reading the upper left corner of the link: IUPAC: International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.
It does not sounds like chemistry, much less pure chemistry. It belongs to nuclear physics.
Historically, new elements were discovered mostly by chemical means, so its the IUPAC that got the task of naming new elements. The fact that new elements are now created in particle accelerators does not necessarily warrant that IUPAC should not be responsible for the periodic table anymore.Stephanus said:Can't help reading the upper left corner of the link: IUPAC: International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.
It does not sounds like chemistry, much less pure chemistry. It belongs to nuclear physics.
It's relativistic in the sense that spin is a relativistic property. However, if you just accept that spin is a property of the electrons, you can get the enhanced reactivity from ordinary non-relativistic QM. It all comes down to spin-orbit coupling. For light atoms, the coupling between the orbital (and spin) angular momenta of different electrons is much larger than the coupling between an individual electron's orbital and spin angular momentum. This means that overall orbital and spin angular momenta are good quantum numbers (this is reflected in elementary atomic physics by the existence of well-defined s, p, d, f, etc. orbitals). However, the spin orbit coupling increases more quickly than the electron-electron coupling as atomic number increases. So for higher Z atoms, the spin-orbit coupling mixes these quantum numbers such that J (the overall angular momentum) is the only good quantum number. Thus, for high Z, things like "s orbital" cease to be well-defined concepts. One of the consequences of this is that periodic trends start to get less reliable for heavier elements.newjerseyrunner said:Yeah, from my limited understanding, small atoms are governed entirely by the laws of quantum physics, but the much larger atoms' outer shells start having relativistic effects which change how they behave and react.
Stephanus said:Can't help reading the upper left corner of the link: IUPAC: International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.
It does not sounds like chemistry, much less pure chemistry. It belongs to nuclear physics.
The completion of the 7th period in the periodic table is significant because it means that all the elements in this period have been discovered and added to the table. This is a major milestone in the study of chemistry and allows for a deeper understanding of the properties and behaviors of these elements.
The elements in the 7th period of the periodic table are:
- Francium (Fr)
- Radium (Ra)
- Actinium (Ac)
- Thorium (Th)
- Protactinium (Pa)
- Uranium (U)
- Neptunium (Np)
- Plutonium (Pu)
- Americium (Am)
- Curium (Cm)
- Berkelium (Bk)
- Californium (Cf)
- Einsteinium (Es)
- Fermium (Fm)
- Mendelevium (Md)
- Nobelium (No)
- Lawrencium (Lr)
- Rutherfordium (Rf)
- Dubnium (Db)
- Seaborgium (Sg)
- Bohrium (Bh)
- Hassium (Hs)
- Meitnerium (Mt)
- Darmstadtium (Ds)
- Roentgenium (Rg)
- Copernicium (Cn)
- Nihonium (Nh)
- Flerovium (Fl)
- Moscovium (Mc)
- Livermorium (Lv)
- Tennessine (Ts)
- Oganesson (Og)
The properties of the elements in the 7th period vary greatly, as they belong to different groups and categories in the periodic table. However, some general characteristics of these elements include:
- They are all metals
- They have high melting and boiling points
- They are highly reactive and can form various compounds
- They have large atomic and ionic radii
- They have multiple oxidation states
- They have radioactive isotopes
The atomic structure of the elements in the 7th period follows the general pattern of the periodic table, with increasing atomic number and atomic mass. However, as the elements in this period have a large number of electrons, their electron configuration can vary and become more complex. Additionally, some of these elements have unstable nuclei, leading to the presence of radioactive isotopes.
The completion of the 7th period has a significant impact on the periodic table as it allows for a more accurate and complete representation of all known elements. It also helps to fill in gaps and inconsistencies in the table, leading to a better understanding of the trends and patterns in the properties of elements. Additionally, it opens up new possibilities for scientific research and applications in various fields.