- #36
- 42,191
- 10,228
Only for those where the normal force is zero.physicsdude101 said:So the accelerations at these points is g downwards. Correct?
Only for those where the normal force is zero.physicsdude101 said:So the accelerations at these points is g downwards. Correct?
For Φ=0, a=0 and for Φ=π, a=-6g. Correct?haruspex said:Only for those where the normal force is zero.
Right for φ=0, but how do you get -6g?physicsdude101 said:For Φ=0, a=0 and for Φ=π, a=-6g. Correct?
In my equation N=mg(3cosφ-2) I put φ=π and get N=-5mg. Then the net force is -5mg-mg=-6mg.haruspex said:Right for φ=0, but how do you get -6g?
The normal force has to be acting vertically upward at the bottom of the loop and the weight vertically downward. So those 2 terms cannot be the same sign.physicsdude101 said:Then the net force is -5mg-mg=-6mg.
Ok so would it be 4mg then? How do I get -5mg using the formula though? Isn't that pointing downwards?TomHart said:The normal force has to be acting vertically upward at the bottom of the loop and the weight vertically downward. So those 2 terms cannot be the same sign.
If you look at how you obtained your equation for N, I think you will find that you have effectively defined it as positive radially outwards.physicsdude101 said:Ok so would it be 4mg then? How do I get -5mg using the formula though? Isn't that pointing downwards?
Ah I think I get it. So my value of -5mg is correct the way I defined N, and it just means that at φ=π it has magnitude 5mg in the positive y direction? Thus the net force would have a magnitude 5mg-mg=4mg in the positive y direction?haruspex said:If you look at how you obtained your equation for N, I think you will find that you have effectively defined it as positive radially outwards.
Yes.physicsdude101 said:Ah I think I get it. So my value of -5mg is correct the way I defined N, and it just means that at φ=π it has magnitude 5mg in the positive y direction? Thus the net force would have a magnitude 5mg-mg=4mg in the positive y direction?