A difficult integral, perhaps involving trig substitutions?

In summary, the student is having difficulty solving a homework problem from Calc 2 that was given to them as a "challenge/bonus problem" on the first day of the class. They are trying to solve it using trig substitution, but are getting stuck when trying to integrate the quartic part. After doing some research, they realize that they can factor the quartic part using the quadratic formula and partial fractions, but are still stuck on how to solve for the u function. They ask for help from their classmate, who tells them that the answer is (x^6 + 1) (x^2 + 1) (x^4 - x^2 + 1).
  • #1
icosane
48
0

Homework Statement



The integral of 1/(1+x^6) dx

The Attempt at a Solution



This problem was given as a "challenge/bonus problem" on the first day of Calc 2, earlier today. Considering we were going over trig substitutions, I suppose there is probably some trig trick to it. Doing it by parts isn't helping... I just get a longer more messy expression to integrate. I also tried a u substitution. I set u = x^(3) to make the integral seem like I could pull out an arctan, But I keep ending up only making the situation worse.

I've typed in the expression into an online integral calculator so I know what the answer is, but I'm confused on how to go about tackling this problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What answer did it give?
 
  • #3
The denominator can be factored into (x2 + 1)(x4 - x2 + 1), and the quartic factor can be factored into (x2 - 1/2 - i/2*sqrt(3))(x2 - 1/2 + i/2*sqrt(3)). At that point you could break up the integral using the technique of partial fractions.
 
  • #4
Thanks mark, can you give me the name of the technique used to factor out the quartic function, or give a little explanation yourself? I can see that it works but I'm curious as how one would go about splitting up a quartic function using imaginary numbers. I have yet to come across this technique in any of my classes. The answer I got for the integral is quite long so I'm not going to write it out but I used the integral calculator found at http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp

Thanks again
 
  • #5
All I used to factor the quartic was the quadratic formula, since this particular quartic was quadratic in form, with a 4th-degree term, a 2nd-degree term, and a constant term.

If you substitute u = x2, the quartic part becomes u2 - u + 1 = 0, and then use the quadratic formula to solve for u (= x2).
 
  • #6
Okay, I sat down today and tried to solve the thing and still can't get it. When I do the partial fractions method I just end up with long ridiculous equations with imaginary numbers in them that don't cancel out. Am I supposed to split up each of the terms again? Or is there a whole different way to approach this problem? I was talking about it with someone who knows how to do it but won't tell me and he looked confused when I mentioned imaginary numbers.

Also just for reference the answer the online integral calculator gave was...

(sqrt(3)*log(x^2+sqrt(3)*x+1)-sqrt(3)*log(x^2-sqrt(3)*x+1)+2*atan(2*x+sqrt(3))+2*atan(2*x-sqrt(3))+4*atan(x))/12
 
  • #7
Notice that [tex] x^6 + 1 = (x^2 +1)(x^4 - x^2 + 1) [/tex].

Since [tex] x^4 - x^2 + 1 = (x^2 + 1)^2 - 3x^2 = (x^2 + 1 - \sqrt(3)x) (x^2 + 1 + \sqrt(3)x) [/tex] **Note that the x is not under the sqrt sign**

And so [tex] x^6 + 1 = (x^2 +1)(x^2 + 1 - \sqrt(3)x) (x^2 + 1 + \sqrt(3)x) [/tex].

You can now use partial fractions.
 
  • #8
[tex]
x^4 - x^2 + 1 = (x^2 + 1)^2 - 3x^2
[/tex]

Thanks for the quick reply! I see that this works... is this a common algebraic maneuver for factoring quartic functions? I have never seen anything like this up to this point.
 
  • #9
I encountered this question a couple months ago, and after a couple frustrating days I finally realized what the trick was.

It was the first time I've also seen something like it :)
 
  • #10
icosane said:
[tex]
x^4 - x^2 + 1 = (x^2 + 1)^2 - 3x^2
[/tex]

Thanks for the quick reply! I see that this works... is this a common algebraic maneuver for factoring quartic functions? I have never seen anything like this up to this point.

You complete the square and obtain a difference of squares, so you can easily factor from there. If I spot a root immediately, then I use synthetic division; if not, then I use this method. But that's just me :)
 
  • #11
JG89 said:
Notice that [tex] x^6 + 1 = (x^2 +1)(x^4 - x^2 + 1) [/tex].

Since [tex] x^4 - x^2 + 1 = (x^2 + 1)^2 - 3x^2 = (x^2 + 1 - \sqrt(3)x) (x^2 + 1 + \sqrt(3)x) [/tex] **Note that the x is not under the sqrt sign**

And so [tex] x^6 + 1 = (x^2 +1)(x^2 + 1 - \sqrt(3)x) (x^2 + 1 + \sqrt(3)x) [/tex].

You can now use partial fractions.

:frown:

I keep coming back to this trying to solve it and just can't get it. Am I supposed to set up partial fractions over the these three terms,

[tex] x^6 + 1 = (x^2 +1)(x^2 + 1 - \sqrt(3)x) (x^2 + 1 + \sqrt(3)x) [/tex]

because even if I did, I wouldn't know how to integrate A/(x^2+1+3^(1/2)*x)... but when I try to split that up using the quadratic formula I get another imaginary number. Am I just supposed to use partial fractions over those 3 terms and then just use integration by parts to solve for some constant over a quadratic?
 
  • #12
When doing partial fractions with quadratics in the denominator, you must use Ax+B, Cx+D, and Ex+F, not A, B, and C. After you do partial fractions, you can algebraically manipulate each expression. For instance, let's say you have to integrate 2xdx/(x^2+sqrt(3)*x+1). You can rewrite this as the integral of (2x+sqrt(3)-sqrt(3))/(x^2+sqrt(3)*x+1). You can then split this up into two integrals; for the first one, you can use substitution, and for the second you will have to manipulate it again by completing the square in the denominator and then using a trig-sub (your answer will involve arctan).
 
  • #13
It would be Ax + B and Cx + D and etc for the numerators, not just a single A B or C constant. If you end up with just a constant, like A/(x^2+1+3^(1/2)*x), then you could complete the square and integrate for an arctan solution.
 

FAQ: A difficult integral, perhaps involving trig substitutions?

What is a difficult integral?

A difficult integral is a mathematical calculation that involves finding the area under a curve or the volume of a shape, but cannot be easily solved using basic integration techniques. These integrals often require more advanced methods, such as trigonometric substitutions, to solve.

What is a trigonometric substitution?

A trigonometric substitution is a technique used in integration to replace a variable with a trigonometric function, such as sine, cosine, or tangent. This substitution can simplify the integral and make it easier to solve.

How do I know when to use a trigonometric substitution?

You can use a trigonometric substitution when you have an integral that contains a square root of a quadratic expression or a sum of squares under a radical. You can also use a trigonometric substitution when you have an integral that contains a product of trigonometric functions raised to a power.

What are some common trigonometric substitutions?

Some common trigonometric substitutions include substituting x = sin⁾, x = cos⁾, or x = tan⁾ in integrals involving square roots of quadratic expressions. For integrals involving a product of trigonometric functions, you may use x = sin⁾, x = cos⁾, or x = tan⁾ raised to a power.

How do I solve a difficult integral using trigonometric substitutions?

To solve a difficult integral using trigonometric substitutions, you first need to identify the appropriate substitution to make. Then, you can use trigonometric identities and algebraic manipulations to simplify the integral into a form that can be easily integrated. Finally, you can use the inverse substitution to find the final solution.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top