A Level: Rearranging Equations into Y = mx + c

  • Thread starter Connor123
  • Start date
  • Tags
    equations
  • #1
Connor123
4
1
Homework Statement
Hello, I recently started A level physics and have been given a HW to rearrange equations into Y = mx + c. I am struggling on what to do next once the independent variable as X is an inverse of the actual variable ( example below)
This may be a really easy question but id appreciate the help :)
Relevant Equations
c = fλ , rearrange into y = mx + c
c = fλ, where the dependent (y) variable is λ, and the independent variable (x) is f.

λ = c/f

c * 1/f = λ

Are you able to leave 1/f as equavalent to simply 'x', where the gradient would be c, or do you have to ensure 'x'/independent variable is actually f?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Connor123 said:
Homework Statement: Hello, I recently started A level physics and have been given a HW to rearrange equations into Y = mx + c. I am struggling on what to do next once the independent variable as X is an inverse of the actual variable ( example below)
This may be a really easy question but id appreciate the help :)
Relevant Equations: c = fλ , rearrange into y = mx + c

c = fλ, where the dependent (y) variable is λ, and the independent variable (x) is f.

λ = c/f

c * 1/f = λ

Are you able to leave 1/f as equavalent to simply 'x', where the gradient would be c, or do you have to ensure 'x'/independent variable is actually f?
If I understand the question, you are simply asked to rename ##\lambda \rightarrow y## and ##f \rightarrow x##.
 
  • #3
What you explain is completely obscure. No way to figure which variable is independent and which is independent in your equation c=fλ . Also not clear if you are or not, asking a simple algebra/arithmetic question.
 
  • #4
Sorry for lack of explanation, in this case dependent = λ while independent = f

so in the form y = mx + c, it would be 'λ = mf +c'

but what would the gradient be ?
 
  • #5
The wavelength is inverse proportional to frequency. So, the x variable cannot be frequency.
 
  • #6
So simply put i've been given an equation that simply doesn't go into the form y = mx + c?
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #7
Connor123 said:
Sorry for lack of explanation, in this case dependent = λ while independent = f

so in the form y = mx + c, it would be 'λ = mf +c'

but what would the gradient be ?
You have to decide what ##c## is in this case. It can't be both the constant in a linear equation and the speed of the wave. This is a weird question

If I was doing this question, I would look for ##\lambda = af + b##, where we use ##a, b## instead of ##m, c##.

Why use ##m## and ##c## in the first place? Why use ##m## for gradient? What's special about the letter ##m##?
 
  • #8
If you have a set of values for f and ##\lambda## you can plot ##\lambda## versus 1/f. So "y" will be ##\lambda## and "x" will be 1/f. The slope of the line of best fit will be the speed of the wave, c. There is no b here. Theoretically, the line should go through the origin.
 
  • #9
In this case we've been given no values, simply to change it, so as you say I assume the line would have no y - intercept, with the gradient of c. Thanks for all your help :)
 
  • #10
I know you have no values. I just tried to explain what is the point of this exercise. The constant m (or c) is the slope of the line.
 
  • Like
Likes Connor123
  • #11
Connor123 said:
So simply put i've been given an equation that simply doesn't go into the form y = mx + c?
Looks like it.
 
  • #12
Connor123 said:
Are you able to leave 1/f as equavalent to simply 'x', where the gradient would be c,
Yes, that is what you are expected to do.
In your experiment, or whatever, the independent variable may be f, but in graphing you are free to make the x coordinate 1/f.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
Yes, that is what you are expected to do.
In your experiment, or whatever, the independent variable may be f, but in graphing you are free to make the x coordinate 1/f.
I don't see that at all. ##\frac 1 x## is not the same as ##x##.
 
  • #14
PeroK said:
I don't see that at all. ##\frac 1 x## is not the same as ##x##.
Sure, but "x" is being used in two different ways in post 1. In one usage it is the x coordinate in a graph of the form y=mx+c. In " and the independent variable (x) is f", the OP seems to be using it as equivalent to "the independent variable". I suspect it was not used that way in the actual problem statement.
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
Sure, but "x" is being used in two different ways in post 1. In one usage it is the x coordinate in a graph of the form y=mx+c. In " and the independent variable (x) is f", the OP seems to be using it as equivalent to "the independent variable". I suspect it was not used that way in the actual problem statement.
I admit I got really confused by the question.
 

FAQ: A Level: Rearranging Equations into Y = mx + c

What is the purpose of rearranging an equation into the form y = mx + c?

The purpose of rearranging an equation into the form y = mx + c is to express it in the slope-intercept form of a linear equation. This form makes it easy to identify the slope (m) of the line and the y-intercept (c), which are essential for graphing the equation and understanding the relationship between the variables.

How do you identify the slope and y-intercept from the equation y = mx + c?

In the equation y = mx + c, the slope (m) is the coefficient of x, and the y-intercept (c) is the constant term. The slope indicates the rate of change of y with respect to x, while the y-intercept is the value of y when x is zero.

What steps are involved in rearranging a linear equation into y = mx + c form?

To rearrange a linear equation into y = mx + c form, follow these steps:1. Isolate the y-term on one side of the equation.2. Move all other terms to the opposite side of the equation.3. Simplify the equation so that y is alone on one side, resulting in the form y = mx + c.

Can any linear equation be rearranged into the form y = mx + c?

Yes, any linear equation can be rearranged into the form y = mx + c, provided it represents a straight line. This includes equations given in standard form (Ax + By = C) or other linear forms. The key is to isolate y and express the equation in terms of y and x.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when rearranging equations into y = mx + c?

Common mistakes to avoid include:1. Failing to properly isolate the y-term, leading to incorrect simplification.2. Incorrectly moving terms across the equals sign, which can introduce sign errors.3. Forgetting to simplify coefficients and constants, resulting in a more complex equation than necessary.4. Mixing up the slope and y-intercept when interpreting the final form.

Back
Top