MHB A positive integer divisible by 2019 the sum of whose decimal digits is 2019.

AI Thread Summary
A positive integer divisible by 2019 with a sum of decimal digits equal to 2019 can be constructed using the number 4038 followed by 167 blocks of 2019. The total digital sum of this number is confirmed to be 2019. The number is also a multiple of 2019, with the quotient being a sequence of 2 followed by 167 blocks of 1. This construction demonstrates the existence of such an integer. The solution showcases a clever approach to the problem.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Prove the existence of a positive integer divisible by $2019$ the sum of whose decimal digits is $2019$.Source: Nordic Math. Contest
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Prove the existence of a positive integer divisible by $2019$ the sum of whose decimal digits is $2019$.Source: Nordic Math. Contest
[sp]$2019$ has digital sum $12$. Twice $2019$ is $4038$, which has digital sum $15$. Also, $$2019 = 15 + 2004 = 15 + 12\cdot167.$$ So the number $$4038\;\overbrace{2019\;2019\;\ldots\;2019}^{167\text{ blocks}},$$ whose decimal expansion consists of $4038$ followed by $167$ blocks of $2019$, has decimal sum $2019$. It is clearly a multiple of $2019$, the quotient being $$2\;\overbrace{0001\;0001\;\ldots\;0001}^{167\text{ blocks}}.$$

[/sp]
 
Thankyou, Opalg, for your participation and - as always - for a clever answer! (Yes)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top