A potential well with 3-fold reflection symmetry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Bloch's theorem and the tight-binding approximation to find eigenstates in a system with three-fold reflection symmetry. The user expresses confusion about how to start the problem and seeks guidance on the application of these concepts. They understand that Bloch's theorem allows for a wavefunction that combines a plane wave with a periodic function but need help in practical application. The request emphasizes the desire for a collaborative discussion rather than direct answers, highlighting the need for clarity in understanding the topic. Overall, the thread seeks to foster a supportive dialogue to navigate the complexities of the homework problem.
lazayama
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Photos are attached below, with figures
Relevant Equations
Bloch's theorem: $$\psi(r)=e^{ikr}u(r)$$
Simultaneous eigenstates of Hamiltonian and Translational operator: $$|\theta>=\Sigma_{n=0} ^{N-1}|n>*e^{in\theta} $$
When we are talking about Bloch's theorem and also the tight-binding approximation, we can use them to help finding eigenstates of a system. However, I am so confused how to apply it in this case (below is my homework) and don't even know how to start it...

All I understand about the Bloch's theorem is that we can find a wavefunction that is a product of plane wave and a periodic function.

This will be great if someone can discuss it with me and direct my thinking...This may be a silly question but I am really lost here... I am not asking for direct answer but I really need a hand on this, so a solid discussion would be really helpful.

Thanks in advance!

Untitled.png

Untitled2.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any comments or suggestions would be highly appreciated, really!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top