A problem about the laws of conservation: Bullet colliding with a wood block

  • #1
Platon7
15
2
Homework Statement
A cannon is fired vertically into a wood block with a mass of 1.4 kg that is at rest directly above it. If the bullet has a mass of 21 g and a velocity of 210 m/s, how high will the block rise in the air after the bullet has penetrated it?
Relevant Equations
KE, PE
I have tried the following. Firstly, we can write the law of conservation of impulse
m1*v1 = m1*v'1 + m2*v'2, that is the first equation for the system. Then we can write the law of conservation of energy, like KE1 + KE2 = PE1 + KE'2, and then we can substitute formulas, but as far as I can see we will get 4 unknows, namely v'1, v'2, h and v''2 and that is the problem. I think about using some kinematics laws but don't know whether it's relevant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
:welcome:

Why do you think mechanical energy is conserved in this case?
 
  • #3
I don't know, the system seems to be closed
 
  • #4
Platon7 said:
I don't know, the system seems to be closed
It is a closed system. But, that does not mean that mechnaical energy is conserved.

Consider two cars of equal mass and equal but opposite speed crashing into each other. The total momentum is zero before the collision (momentum being a vector) and zero afterwards. But, the total energy before the collision is not zero. Mechanical (kinetic) energy is lost in such a head-on collision.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
  • #5
Is there any further description in the problem such as what exactly does it mean by penetration? Does the bullet stop imbedded in the block or go all the way through it according to the problem?
 
  • #6
bob012345 said:
Is there any further description in the problem such as what exactly does it mean by penetration? Does the bullet stop imbedded in the block or go all the way through it according to the problem?
As far as I understood, goes through and continues moving.
 
  • #7
PeroK said:
It is a closed system. But, that does not mean that mechnaical energy is conserved.

Consider two cars of equal mass and equal but opposite speed crashing into each other. The total momentum is zero before the collision (momentum being a vector) and zero afterwards. But, the total energy before the collision is not zero. Mechanical (kinetic) energy is lost in such a head-on collision.
Yeah, I didn't think about that and it makes sense, because while penetrating almost for sure some energy was spent on heating the block, but then how am I suppoused to move further with solution?
 
  • #8
Platon7 said:
As far as I understood, goes through and continues moving.
Then could you put the whole problem statement here exactly as it was given to you. Leave out no details.
 
  • #9
bob012345 said:
Then could you put the whole problem statement here exactly as it was given to you. Leave out no details.
it is a full statement as I have written
 
  • #10
Platon7 said:
Yeah, I didn't think about that and it makes sense, because while penetrating almost for sure some energy was spent on heating the block, but then how am I suppoused to move further with solution?
Consider the collision between the bullet and the block. If the bullet is embedded in the block (which is what you are supposed to assume), then what does conservation of momentum tell you?
 
  • Like
Likes bob012345
  • #11
PeroK said:
Consider the collision between the bullet and the block. If the bullet is embedded in the block (which is what you are supposed to assume), then what does conservation of momentum tell you?
m1*v1 = m1*v'1 + m2*v'2, where m1 and m2 - are masses of bullet and block respectively, v1 - velocity of bullet before the collision, v'1 and v'2 - after
 
  • #12
Platon7 said:
m1*v1 = m1*v'1 + m2*v'2, where m1 and m2 - are masses of bullet and block respectively, v1 - velocity of bullet before the collision, v'1 and v'2 - after
It tells you more than that. Remember that ##m_1## is embedded in ##m_2##. What does that tell you about ##v'_1## and ##v'_2##?
 
  • #13
oh, yeah, v'1 = v'2 = u, then we can calculate u, but what's next step?
 
  • #14
Platon7 said:
oh, yeah, v'1 = v'2 = u, then we can calculate u, but what's next step?
Projectile motion?
 
  • #15
PeroK said:
Projectile motion?
decelerated by g
 
  • #16
Platon7 said:
decelerated by g
What else!
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
What else!
I don't know, rectilinear also, we know the velocity before penetrating
 
  • #18
Platon7 said:
I don't know, rectilinear also, we know the velocity before penetrating
There's only gravity acting on the block and bullet after the collision.
 
  • #19
oh, now I see, then we can find h using (v^2-v0^2)/(2*a), right?
 
  • #20
Platon7 said:
oh, now I see, then we can find h using (v^2-v0^2)/(2*a), right?
Yes, or your original idea to use conservation of energy for the projectile motion phase.
 
  • #21
I didn't really understand that, so you mean, m1*v1^2 = (m1+m2)*g*h. I'm not sure about the right part of equation
 
  • #22
Platon7 said:
I didn't really understand that, so you mean, m1*v1^2 = (m1+m2)*g*h. I'm not sure about the right part of equation
That equation ignores the collision. This problem has two parts:

a) a totally inelastic collision.

b) vertical projectile motion.

You have to tackle these two parts separately.
 
  • Like
Likes neilparker62
  • #23
do you mean (m1+m2)*g*h = (m1+m2)*u^2/2?
 
  • #24
Platon7 said:
do you mean (m1+m2)*g*h = (m1+m2)*u^2/2?
That looks right.
 
  • #25
yeah, because after dividing both parts for (m1+m2) we will get sth, that I have already mentioned above
 
  • #26
but when we assume that the bullet has penetrated and left the block, can we solve the problem?
 
  • #27
Platon7 said:
but when we assume that the bullet has penetrated and left the block, can we solve the problem?
You have to assume that the bullet is embedded in the block. If it passes through, you don't know the speed of the block.
 
  • Like
Likes neilparker62
  • #28
PeroK said:
You have to assume that the bullet is embedded in the block. If it passes through, you don't know the speed of the block.
Okey, that you for help:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes bob012345 and PeroK
  • #29
Platon7 said:
but when we assume that the bullet has penetrated and left the block, can we solve the problem?
That would be a different problem and more data would have been provided to solve it. I do think the problem statement by the author could have been clearer.
 
  • Like
Likes Platon7
Back
Top