- #1
krishna mohan
- 117
- 0
Hi...
I have been pondering over this problem for sometime...
This is problem no 4-9 in Binney and Tremaine's Galactic Dynamics first edition...
In a singular isothermal sphere with an isotropic dispersion tensor, the RMS speed is [tex]\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}v_c[/tex], where [tex]v_c[/tex] is the circular speed. In a system with the same mass distribution, but with all stars on randomly oriented circular orbits, the RMS speed is [tex]v_c[/tex].
Thus, the two systems have identical density distributions but different amounts of kinetic energy per star.
How is this consistent with the virial theorem?
Can anyone suggest anything?
I have been pondering over this problem for sometime...
This is problem no 4-9 in Binney and Tremaine's Galactic Dynamics first edition...
In a singular isothermal sphere with an isotropic dispersion tensor, the RMS speed is [tex]\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}v_c[/tex], where [tex]v_c[/tex] is the circular speed. In a system with the same mass distribution, but with all stars on randomly oriented circular orbits, the RMS speed is [tex]v_c[/tex].
Thus, the two systems have identical density distributions but different amounts of kinetic energy per star.
How is this consistent with the virial theorem?
Can anyone suggest anything?