A Process of Successive Approximations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Viona
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Process
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the process of successive approximations as explained in Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics." This method involves starting with an initial guess for the solution and expanding it in terms of a small parameter, denoted as ε, to derive a series of approximations. The key steps include plugging the approximated solutions into the equation, equating terms of the same order, and solving iteratively. The user expresses confusion about equating first-order terms with zeroth-order terms due to the smallness of the perturbation, H'. They conclude by stating their approach to the first-order equation, seeking validation of their method. Understanding this process is crucial for applying time-dependent perturbation theory effectively.
Viona
Messages
49
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
What is the Process of Successive Approximations, how I can use it?
Relevant Equations
I need to simple mathematical example to understand it, where I can find that?
I was reading in the Book: Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David J. Griffiths. In chapter Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory, Section: Two-level system. Every thing was fine till He said He will solve this equation:

sdw.png


by a process of successive approximations. I have no idea what this process is and I did not find it in some books for Mathematical Methods. Please help me to understand it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Griffiths must have explained it. Basically, you start with an initial guess of the solution and assume that solutions look like:

$$c_a=\epsilon^0c^0_a+\epsilon^1 c^1_a+\epsilon^2c^2_a+...$$
$$c_b=\epsilon^0c^0_b+\epsilon^1 c^1_b+\epsilon^3c^2_b+...$$

Here the superscript denotes the order of that element. The ##\epsilon^n## too denotes the order of elements (This is just a book-keeping device. You will set it to 1 at the end). Now, you plug these into the expression remembering that ##H'## is small, so, it is itself of the order ##\epsilon##. Once you plug it, you equate terms of same order. Start by equating zeroth order terms first, then plug this solution in the equation you get after equating first order elements and so on...
 
It worked now, but I equated the the first order of ##\epsilon## (in the left side) with the zeroth order of ##\epsilon ## (in the right side) because the right side is multiplied by ##H^{'}## which is small (of the same order of ##\epsilon##). For example for the first order of ## \epsilon## i wrote:
$$ dc^{(1)}_{a} /dt =-(i /\hbar) H^{'} c^{(0)}_{b}$$
I hope this is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes Abhishek11235
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top