- #1
Artusartos
- 247
- 0
This is how L'Hopital's Rule is defined in our textbook:
"Let s signify [itex] a, a^+, a^-, \infty or - \infty [/itex] and suppose f and g are differentiable functions for which hte following limit exists:
[itex] lim_{x \rightarrow s} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} = L [/itex]..................(1)
If
[itex] lim_{x \rightarrow s} f(x) = lim_{x \rightarrow s} g(x) = 0 [/itex]................(2)
or if
[itex] lim_{x \rightarrow s} |g(x)| = + \infty [/itex].....................(3)
then
[itex] lim_{x \rightarrow s} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = L [/itex]....................(4)
Here is the part that I was having trouble with...
Note that the hypthesis (1) includes some implicit assumptions: f and g must be defined and differentiable "near" s and g'(x) must be nonzero "near" s. For example, if [itex] lim_{x \rightarrow a^+} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} [/itex] exists, then there g' is nonzero. The requirement that g' be nonzero is crucial; see Exercise 30.7.
This is what exercise 30.7 is:
This example is taken from [38] and is due to Otto Stolz, Math, annalen 15 (1879), 556-559. The requirement in Theorem 30.2 [the one that I wrote above] that [itex] g'(x) \not= 0 [/itex] for x "near" s is important. In a careless application of L'Hopital's rule in which the zeros of g' "cancel" the zeros of f' erroneous results can be obtained. For x in R, let
f(x) = x + cosxsinx and [itex] g(x)= e^{sinx}(x+cosxsinx)[/itex]
[itex] \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} = \frac{2e^{-sinx}cosx}{2cosx+f(x)} [/itex] if cosx is not zero adn x>3.
Show that [itex] lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{2e^{-sinx}cosx}{2cosx+f(x)} = 0 [/itex] and yet the limit [itex] lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}[/itex] does not exist.
I'm a bit confused about this, because I don't think I understood that theorem correctly...so can anybody clarify it for me?
For example, with this exercise...when I graphed f(x) and g(x), they both looked continuous and smooth...so obviously they were differentiable. But I could not understand how g'(x) is zero "near" infinity, because (as I said), I'm having trouble understanding the theorem...
"Let s signify [itex] a, a^+, a^-, \infty or - \infty [/itex] and suppose f and g are differentiable functions for which hte following limit exists:
[itex] lim_{x \rightarrow s} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} = L [/itex]..................(1)
If
[itex] lim_{x \rightarrow s} f(x) = lim_{x \rightarrow s} g(x) = 0 [/itex]................(2)
or if
[itex] lim_{x \rightarrow s} |g(x)| = + \infty [/itex].....................(3)
then
[itex] lim_{x \rightarrow s} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = L [/itex]....................(4)
Here is the part that I was having trouble with...
Note that the hypthesis (1) includes some implicit assumptions: f and g must be defined and differentiable "near" s and g'(x) must be nonzero "near" s. For example, if [itex] lim_{x \rightarrow a^+} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} [/itex] exists, then there g' is nonzero. The requirement that g' be nonzero is crucial; see Exercise 30.7.
This is what exercise 30.7 is:
This example is taken from [38] and is due to Otto Stolz, Math, annalen 15 (1879), 556-559. The requirement in Theorem 30.2 [the one that I wrote above] that [itex] g'(x) \not= 0 [/itex] for x "near" s is important. In a careless application of L'Hopital's rule in which the zeros of g' "cancel" the zeros of f' erroneous results can be obtained. For x in R, let
f(x) = x + cosxsinx and [itex] g(x)= e^{sinx}(x+cosxsinx)[/itex]
[itex] \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} = \frac{2e^{-sinx}cosx}{2cosx+f(x)} [/itex] if cosx is not zero adn x>3.
Show that [itex] lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{2e^{-sinx}cosx}{2cosx+f(x)} = 0 [/itex] and yet the limit [itex] lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}[/itex] does not exist.
I'm a bit confused about this, because I don't think I understood that theorem correctly...so can anybody clarify it for me?
For example, with this exercise...when I graphed f(x) and g(x), they both looked continuous and smooth...so obviously they were differentiable. But I could not understand how g'(x) is zero "near" infinity, because (as I said), I'm having trouble understanding the theorem...
Last edited: