A replacement for Mcauley's Classical mechanics

In summary, Mcauley's "Classical mechanics: transformations, flows, integrable and chaotic dynamics" offers a unique perspective on Hamiltonian flows and chaos, avoiding the use of modern differential geometry. However, the book may be poorly written and disorganized, causing confusion for readers. The book "Introduction to Dynamics" by Percival and Richards may be a good alternative, although it may be at a slightly lower level.
  • #1
andresB
629
375
Mcauley's "Classical mechanics: transformations, flows, integrable and chaotic dynamics" has a very interesting table of contents, and it has a philosophy of approaching Hamiltonian flows and chaos without using the formalism of modern differential geometry.
Unfortunately, after reading the first three chapters, I think that the book is confusing and badly written, and the ideas are not well organized. So, is there any other book at the same level, with the same approach, but better written?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I am unfamiliar with your book.
Introduction to Dynamics by Percival and Richards
appears to be at a slightly lower level, but on the other hand it is a good book.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes andresB

FAQ: A replacement for Mcauley's Classical mechanics

What is Mcauley's Classical mechanics?

Mcauley's Classical mechanics is a theory that describes the motion of objects in the physical world using mathematical equations and principles.

Why is there a need for a replacement for Mcauley's Classical mechanics?

While Mcauley's Classical mechanics is a widely accepted theory, it has some limitations and does not fully explain certain phenomena, such as the behavior of particles at the quantum level.

What improvements does the replacement for Mcauley's Classical mechanics offer?

The replacement for Mcauley's Classical mechanics offers a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the physical world, particularly at the quantum level. It also incorporates new discoveries and advancements in science.

Is the replacement for Mcauley's Classical mechanics widely accepted by the scientific community?

As with any new theory, there may be debate and skepticism within the scientific community. However, the replacement for Mcauley's Classical mechanics is backed by extensive research and evidence, and is gaining acceptance among scientists.

How does the replacement for Mcauley's Classical mechanics impact our understanding of the universe?

The replacement for Mcauley's Classical mechanics expands our understanding of the universe and allows us to make more accurate predictions about the behavior of objects and particles. It also provides a framework for further scientific discoveries and advancements.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
13K
Back
Top