A ship, earth, and a missile. Which time gests dilated and why?

In summary, The distance between the hostile spacecraft and the outpost on a distant planet is 3.0*10^{7} km and the missile launched at the enemy has a speed of 0.5c. The time it takes for the missile to hit the enemy spacecraft, as seen in the rest frame of the enemy spacecraft, is dependent on the concept of proper length and length contraction. This means that the distance between the two objects will appear to be different for observers in different reference frames. The confusion arises when trying to determine which length is contracted, as both scenarios are symmetric. However, this is due to the observer-dependent nature of simultaneity. Therefore, the answer to the question cannot be determined without considering the proper length and
  • #1
HelloDrChewz
2
0

Homework Statement



"A hostile spacecraft approaches your outpost on a distant planet at a speed of 0.3c. When it is at a distance of 3.0*[itex]10^{7}[/itex] km you launch a missile at the enemy with a speed of 0.5c.

How much time will elapse before the missile hits the enemy spacecraft as seen in the rest frame of the enemy spacecraft ?"


Homework Equations



x' = γ(x-vt)
t' = γ(t-[itex]\frac{vx}{[itex]c^{2}[/itex]}[/itex])
U' = [itex]\frac{U-v}{1-\frac{uv}{c^{2}}}[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution



This was a test question that I got wrong. I figured if I found the velocity of the missile with respect to the ship, then divided the distance by the velocity, I'd have the time. What I forgot to account for was length contraction. But, it seems to me that this is essentially the twin paradox. How does one determine which length is contracted when in either reference frame the other is flying toward it with v=0.3c. The scenarios are symmetric.
I tried to do the lorentz transformations to find the distance in the moving reference frame, but found the time coordinates were different for those two points.
Am I overlooking something here? Is there a logic behind picking one to be contracted over the other?
When I ask my professor, he tells me that he defined it as proper length. But his choice seems to me to be entirely arbitrary, and not explicitly defined in the problem, so there must be something I'm not getting, right?
When I'd first approached my professor about this, I told him that if he sees a contracted length due to him being in a moving reference frame, then according to him, we would see a contracted length because we're in a moving reference frame (according to him). Then you get in an endless contraction loop. To this my professor said, you can't change reference frames. But I thought that's what these Lorentz transformations were for! What does that mean when they say you can't change reference frames?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The distance to the ship, ##3.0\times 10^7\text{ km}## is measured in the rest frame of the outpost, so it isn't length-contracted in that frame. That's what your professor meant when he said it was the proper length. It's the distance as measure in the designated rest frame. The ship, which is moving relative to the outpost, will see a smaller spatial separation because of length contraction.
 
  • #3
yea, but my question is, why? If there is indeed no preferred reference frame, where does this asymmetric answer come from? If it's because he shot the missile, then let us consider the instant before the missile was shot. At that point you have a ship approaching a planet (and conversely, a planet approaching a ship). An observer on the planet measures the distance between them at an instant to be A meters, while an observer on the ship measures the distance between them at the same instant to be B meters. Where is the asymmetry? What am I missing?
 
  • #4
I think it would be helpful if you drew space-time diagrams for both the planet's rest frame and the ship's rest frame.

The reason behind your confusion is manifest in this sentence: "An observer on the planet measures the distance between them at an instant to be A meters, while an observer on the ship measures the distance between them at the same instant to be B meters." There is no same instant for the observer on the planet and the observer on the ship. Simultaneity is observer dependent.

The problem tells you that the ship and planet are separated by ##D=3.0\times 10^7\text{ km}## as measured in the rest frame of the planet. Unprimed coordinate correspond to the planet's rest frame, and primed coordinates, to the ship's rest frame. So say this means that at t=0, xship=0 and xplanet=D. In the planet's rest frame, the launch of the missile also happens at t=0. Now when you say "same instant" in the ship's frame, what do you mean? Is it when the ship passes through x=0 or when the missile is launched from x=D at t=0? Those two events aren't simultaneous as far as observers on the ship are concerned.
 
  • #5

I would approach this problem by first understanding the concept of time dilation and length contraction in special relativity. Time dilation refers to the fact that time appears to pass slower for an observer in motion compared to an observer at rest. This is due to the fact that the speed of light is constant for all observers, and therefore, the perception of time passing is relative to the observer's frame of reference. Length contraction, on the other hand, refers to the fact that an object in motion appears shorter in the direction of motion compared to an object at rest. This is also a consequence of the constant speed of light and the relativity of simultaneity.

In this scenario, the time dilation and length contraction effects will be different for the missile and the enemy spacecraft. This is because they are moving at different speeds relative to each other. The missile is moving at 0.5c relative to the enemy spacecraft, while the enemy spacecraft is moving at 0.3c relative to the outpost. Therefore, the time dilation and length contraction will be different for each object.

To solve the problem, we can use the Lorentz transformations to calculate the time and distance in the rest frame of the enemy spacecraft. According to the Lorentz transformations, the distance in the rest frame of the enemy spacecraft will be contracted by a factor of 1/γ, where γ is the Lorentz factor given by γ = 1/√(1- v^2/c^2), where v is the relative speed between the two objects. In this case, v = 0.5c, and therefore, γ = 1/√(1- 0.5^2) = 1/√(0.75) = 1.15. This means that the distance of 3.0*10^7 km will be contracted to 3.0*10^7/1.15 = 2.6*10^7 km in the rest frame of the enemy spacecraft.

Similarly, the time in the rest frame of the enemy spacecraft will be dilated by a factor of γ. This means that the time taken for the missile to travel this distance will be longer in the rest frame of the enemy spacecraft compared to the time measured in the outpost frame. To calculate the time, we can use the time dilation equation t' = γ(t- vx/c^2), where t is the time measured
 

FAQ: A ship, earth, and a missile. Which time gests dilated and why?

How does the speed of a ship affect time dilation?

According to Einstein's theory of relativity, time dilation occurs when an object moves at high speeds, causing time to pass slower for that object. Therefore, the faster a ship travels, the more time dilation will occur.

Does the mass of the Earth play a role in time dilation?

Yes, the mass of an object can also affect time dilation. The Earth's large mass causes a significant gravitational pull, which can also slow down time for objects near it.

Why do missiles experience time dilation?

Missiles, like any other object that moves at high speeds, experience time dilation due to their velocity. The faster they travel, the more time dilation occurs for them.

Is time dilation the same for all objects in space?

No, time dilation can vary depending on the object's speed and mass. For example, a spaceship traveling at a higher speed than a satellite will experience more time dilation.

How does time dilation affect our perception of time?

Time dilation may cause time to appear slower for an object in motion, but for the observer, time will appear normal. This is because the observer is not moving at high speeds and is not experiencing time dilation.

Back
Top