- #1
HelloDrChewz
- 2
- 0
Homework Statement
"A hostile spacecraft approaches your outpost on a distant planet at a speed of 0.3c. When it is at a distance of 3.0*[itex]10^{7}[/itex] km you launch a missile at the enemy with a speed of 0.5c.
How much time will elapse before the missile hits the enemy spacecraft as seen in the rest frame of the enemy spacecraft ?"
Homework Equations
x' = γ(x-vt)
t' = γ(t-[itex]\frac{vx}{[itex]c^{2}[/itex]}[/itex])
U' = [itex]\frac{U-v}{1-\frac{uv}{c^{2}}}[/itex]
The Attempt at a Solution
This was a test question that I got wrong. I figured if I found the velocity of the missile with respect to the ship, then divided the distance by the velocity, I'd have the time. What I forgot to account for was length contraction. But, it seems to me that this is essentially the twin paradox. How does one determine which length is contracted when in either reference frame the other is flying toward it with v=0.3c. The scenarios are symmetric.
I tried to do the lorentz transformations to find the distance in the moving reference frame, but found the time coordinates were different for those two points.
Am I overlooking something here? Is there a logic behind picking one to be contracted over the other?
When I ask my professor, he tells me that he defined it as proper length. But his choice seems to me to be entirely arbitrary, and not explicitly defined in the problem, so there must be something I'm not getting, right?
When I'd first approached my professor about this, I told him that if he sees a contracted length due to him being in a moving reference frame, then according to him, we would see a contracted length because we're in a moving reference frame (according to him). Then you get in an endless contraction loop. To this my professor said, you can't change reference frames. But I thought that's what these Lorentz transformations were for! What does that mean when they say you can't change reference frames?