A Strange Kind of Shame: A Heartbreaking Story of Compassion and Understanding

  • Thread starter Math Is Hard
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Strange
In summary, the conversation discusses the experience of the speaker working with a woman at their organization who was feared and disliked. The speaker shares their initial negative thoughts about the woman, but later learns that she had been sick with a terminal illness and had recently passed away. The speaker feels guilty for their previous negative thoughts and regrets not being more compassionate. They also discuss a similar experience with a comedian who made jokes about cancer, not realizing he was also suffering from the disease. The conversation ends with the reflection that sometimes people joke or act a certain way as a coping mechanism.
  • #1
Math Is Hard
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,652
38
There was a woman at our organization who was quite formidable and tyrannical.
I work for the group that services everyone's computers and I was loathe to get a call from her. If she had a computer problem she would call in a fury screaming, "I am the director of this department and someone better get up here and fix my computer now!"
Arriving at the scene, I was hollered at as if I were a lazy servant-girl who could not move fast enough to do her bidding.
The last time I spoke with her was about six weeks ago. She said she was going on a trip so she needed all her remote access issues sorted out.
There were times, in passing, that I grumbled about her and bad-mouthed her to a few of co-workers.
"What the hell was this crazy woman's problem?! Geez!"

It is my job, I should explain, to add and remove people from our network as they come and go. I got a call from HR this morning to remove her accounts. ASAP!
With a secret delight I thought, "Oh my! She has finally bawled out the wrong person and has gotten the boot."
I called HR back to let them know that I had completed the request to deactivate the accounts.
The HR person who submitted the request was not there so I spoke to someone else. "Which employee are you talking about?" he asked. I told him. "Oh, yes." he said, "She died."
Words cannot describe the feeling that came over me. He explained that she had been very sick with a terminal illness for some time (at least as long as I had known her).
"But I just saw her!" I said, "I was helping her get her laptop ready so she could go on a trip."
"Is that what she told you?" he said. "No, that wasn't exactly the case. She was at a point where she couldn't work from the office anymore."
Guilt overwhelms me now. I had always considered myself a compassionate person until today.
When people cut in front of me in traffic I just assume that there is a very important reason they are in a hurry which I do not know.
I have failed to be compassionate this time. I never considered that this woman might be going through something so tragic.
This is a very strange shame that I feel. Has anyone else had an experience like this, when someone you didn't much care for is suddenly gone, and you wish you hadn't thought all those bad things about the person?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your conscience has emerged, that's all. and it is good it hasn't got lost.
 
  • #3
I suppose anyone with a terminal illness might resort to desparate behavior if they're freaked out, and this would have explained a lot if you'd known. The fact you had no idea, though, pretty much vindicates your irritation with her. I've known quite a few people who acted like her who were nowhere near death, and there is no reason for anyone to automatically suppose someone acting like that must be terminally ill. In 99.9 percent of cases that would be an extreme thing to suspect.
 
  • #4
its not a thing to bother about, i feel. its just a matter of rare chance that such an experience has haunted you. different people have different traits. they have their own ways of interacting with others. its best not to dissect someone's character. Instead try to think that..he/she has been 'trained' to lead such a life on Earth and succeeded in that mission. philosophy explains everything... except philosophy.
 
  • #5
This might be out of the subject.

A few years ago in France, there was this guy on the radio who was so clever, cultivated and yet the funniest. He always had strong opinions on "hot" topics going on. Well, one December month he began making fun with people suffering from cancer. It looked horrible. People calling on the phone would sometime shout at him and get mad because of that. He also ended his broadcast at that time with the intriguing sentence
"As for March, I tell without political preconception idea, but I guess it won't go through winter"

Indeed, he died of advanced cancer about March. I loved him. His name was Pierre Desproges, he is famous in France. Nobody knew why he kept laughing all along with cancer. In any case somebody speaks french :
http://www.christophecourtin.com/desproges/index.asp

Not a single journalist in the country had any idea of his illness. Imagine the lesson he taught to people thinking he was a bastard, because them (or a related) were suffering.
 
  • #6
humanino said:
Imagine the lesson he taught to people thinking he was a bastard, because them (or a related) were suffering.
There is some serious psychological crap in this guy's way of handling it: denial and dissociation. He wasn't the spirit free of pain and fear you think he was. The fact he didn't tell he had cancer and made fun of others who also had it was just plain cruel to them and their relatives. There is a certain percentage of comedians like this: they joke because it is the only way they know how to handle anything. They don't seem to be able to stop even if they want to.
 
  • #7
Sounds like me.

I joke around a lot with friends and they take the insults and jokes sportingly and I get them back in the end. But I came across one person who was softer and didn't show it. They were also a bit stupid so I used that. She just laughed and so the insults got worse.

Most people took them with no problem and we would joke about it. But this one female finally cracked and told me she was soft and that I was bullying her, which I wasn't; I was treating her the same as anyone else. She said she would go to the police if she had to and I felt really bad that I hadn't realized.

I wouldn't worry about it too much. People get to you and you react the same each time. It is not in human nature to ask why. It is a question you need to ask more and more. Make sure you have a reason for hating someone rather than doing it on face value. If people took me on face value I would have very few good friends.

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
  • #8
zoobyshoe said:
There is some serious psychological crap in this guy's way of handling it: denial and dissociation. He wasn't the spirit free of pain and fear you think he was. The fact he didn't tell he had cancer and made fun of others who also had it was just plain cruel to them and their relatives. There is a certain percentage of comedians like this: they joke because it is the only way they know how to handle anything. They don't seem to be able to stop even if they want to.

I might not be able to explain in a foreign language how a brillant mind he was. But I swear he was. He really had a philosophical message behind it.

But anyway, I am pretty sure Math_Is_Hard is hard with herself. You do not look like somebody used to fastly judge people. Maybe you made a few mistakes.

PS : by the way, Math Is Art :-p
 
  • #9
Math Is Hard said:
There was a woman at our organization who was quite formidable and tyrannical.
I work for the group that services everyone's computers and I was loathe to get a call from her. If she had a computer problem she would call in a fury screaming, "I am the director of this department and someone better get up here and fix my computer now!"
Arriving at the scene, I was hollered at as if I were a lazy servant-girl who could not move fast enough to do her bidding.
The last time I spoke with her was about six weeks ago. She said she was going on a trip so she needed all her remote access issues sorted out.
There were times, in passing, that I grumbled about her and bad-mouthed her to a few of co-workers.
"What the hell was this crazy woman's problem?! Geez!"

It is my job, I should explain, to add and remove people from our network as they come and go. I got a call from HR this morning to remove her accounts. ASAP!
With a secret delight I thought, "Oh my! She has finally bawled out the wrong person and has gotten the boot."
I called HR back to let them know that I had completed the request to deactivate the accounts.
The HR person who submitted the request was not there so I spoke to someone else. "Which employee are you talking about?" he asked. I told him. "Oh, yes." he said, "She died."
Words cannot describe the feeling that came over me. He explained that she had been very sick with a terminal illness for some time (at least as long as I had known her).
"But I just saw her!" I said, "I was helping her get her laptop ready so she could go on a trip."
"Is that what she told you?" he said. "No, that wasn't exactly the case. She was at a point where she couldn't work from the office anymore."
Guilt overwhelms me now. I had always considered myself a compassionate person until today.
When people cut in front of me in traffic I just assume that there is a very important reason they are in a hurry which I do not know.
I have failed to be compassionate this time. I never considered that this woman might be going through something so tragic.
This is a very strange shame that I feel. Has anyone else had an experience like this, when someone you didn't much care for is suddenly gone, and you wish you hadn't thought all those bad things about the person?


Are you sure you don't work where I do?;) I do what you do and I have some people here I wouldn't miss too horribly. Not that I wish them dead, but I wouldn't miss them.. hehehe

In your case, plausible deniability is king, and ignorance is bliss. You can't be held responsible for what you didn't know. That person would have died weather you loved or hated them. They CHOSE to act that way, and so illicit your reaction. Don't let it get you down.
 
  • #10
humanino said:
This might be out of the subject.

A few years ago in France, there was this guy on the radio who was so clever, cultivated and yet the funniest. He always had strong opinions on "hot" topics going on. Well, one December month he began making fun with people suffering from cancer. It looked horrible. People calling on the phone would sometime shout at him and get mad because of that. He also ended his broadcast at that time with the intriguing sentence
"As for March, I tell without political preconception idea, but I guess it won't go through winter"

Indeed, he died of advanced cancer about March. I loved him. His name was Pierre Desproges, he is famous in France. Nobody knew why he kept laughing all along with cancer. In any case somebody speaks french :
http://www.christophecourtin.com/desproges/index.asp

Not a single journalist in the country had any idea of his illness. Imagine the lesson he taught to people thinking he was a bastard, because them (or a related) were suffering.

Tres interressant...

On the one hand we have a man who played on people's emotions to illicit a reaction. On the other, we could ascertain that he was trying to teach a very valuable lesson about jumping to conclusions and how we judge people.

qui connais la couer de la mourant...
 
  • #11
thanks for your comments on this. I sure learned a lesson.
That is an amazing story about the radio host, humanino. He had the "last laugh" on everyone, I guess.
 
  • #12
The Bob said:
But this one female finally cracked and told me she was soft and that I was bullying her, which I wasn't; I was treating her the same as anyone else. She said she would go to the police if she had to and I felt really bad that I hadn't realized.
Important rule of comedy: Know Your Audience. There is no humor that is inherently funny in and of itself that everyone should be expected to find amusing. A good comedian knows that you don't tell the same kind of jokes to a ladies club in DesMoines, Iowa, that you tell to kids on a college campus, and that you don't use the same kind of humor on those kids as you would on a bunch of prison inmates. Treating her the same as everyone else, you were neglecting to be sensitive to your audience. (I speak from experience, here. I've performed a lot of comedy in front of a wide variety of audiences.)
 
  • #13
humanino said:
I might not be able to explain in a foreign language how a brillant mind he was. But I swear he was. He really had a philosophical message behind it.
What's the use of his brilliant philosophical message if he just ended up hurting the feelings of a lot of people who were dying of cancer? It's nice that you can sit on the side lines and observe the whole thing with detached intellectual curiosity, but the people he was making fun of didn't have that luxury.
 
  • #14
zoobyshoe said:
Important rule of comedy: Know Your Audience. There is no humor that is inherently funny in and of itself that everyone should be expected to find amusing. A good comedian knows that you don't tell the same kind of jokes to a ladies club in DesMoines, Iowa, that you tell to kids on a college campus, and that you don't use the same kind of humor on those kids as you would on a bunch of prison inmates. Treating her the same as everyone else, you were neglecting to be sensitive to your audience. (I speak from experience, here. I've performed a lot of comedy in front of a wide variety of audiences.)

Ah but all of us use the same comedy still in the Army Cadet Force. I do apply for audiences though and so it is just one person in an audience to apply for.

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
  • #15
zoobyshoe said:
What's the use of his brilliant philosophical message if he just ended up hurting the feelings of a lot of people who were dying of cancer? It's nice that you can sit on the side lines and observe the whole thing with detached intellectual curiosity, but the people he was making fun of didn't have that luxury.

It is very dark humor, but it sounds a bit like something Andy Kaufman might have come up with. Didn't some people think it was all just a put-on when he was dying?
 
  • #16
Math Is Hard said:
It is very dark humor, but it sounds a bit like something Andy Kaufman might have come up with. Didn't some people think it was all just a put-on when he was dying?
That's what I've heard: a lot of people wondered if the announcement that he had terminal cancer wasn't just another of his bizarre put-ons.

As for this French guy, the fact he had a mordent punchline waiting doesn't excuse the involuntary use of people on their deathbeds for his joke. I knew a guy who died of cancer and for two years he basically lived in a state of low grade fear.
 
  • #17
Math Is Hard said:
I have failed to be compassionate this time. I never considered that this woman might be going through something so tragic.
This is a very strange shame that I feel. Has anyone else had an experience like this, when someone you didn't much care for is suddenly gone, and you wish you hadn't thought all those bad things about the person?

It seems to me that one possibility is overlooked in all of this. It is always possible that she was a terrible and nasty person. Your reactions might have been right on in spite of her illness. Even mean and nasty people get sick and die.

I don't mean to sound heartless or unsympathetic, but the assumption that while in good health, she was other than as you perceived, is unfounded.
 
  • #18
Ivan Seeking said:
It seems to me that one possibility is overlooked in all of this. It is always possible that she was a terrible and nasty person. Your reactions might have been right on in spite of her illness. Even mean and nasty people get sick and die.
I don't mean to sound heartless or unsympathetic, but the assumption that while in good health, she was other than as you perceived, is unfounded.
There's been some subtle clues dropped on me that this was actually the case. That she was always a "difficult" person even when she was feeling her best.
The thing that bugs me is that when I first got word to take her off the network, I felt a little pleasure thinking that she had gotten herself in trouble and was getting her come-uppance for snapping at people. :devil: I was expecting the HR person to tell me a scandalous tale of how she'd finally gone nuts and told the Dean to go to hell or something like that. I was not expecting anything like the news that came next.
 
  • #19
Math Is Hard said:
I was not expecting anything like the news that came next.
Same thing happened to me once. A boss I had who was on the "difficult" side, and whom I wished were not there, get into a bad car accident and had to stop work indefinitely. You just end up feeling really yecky because you're glad they're gone but you certainly didn't want it to happen that way. You may hope they get fired, but you'd be really happy if they just quit and went somewhere else. Then, if they're gone because something really bad happened to them you get thrown into guilt.
 
  • #20
And then there's that subtle but illogical gnawing feeling that perhaps you actually wished that person into the cornfield. <shudder>
 
  • #21
My business often puts me in highly ego competitive situtions. I am usually intruding on someones turf and things can get quite nasty. I recently had a guy sabotage a major system that I had just approved for operations. He did it in such a way that someone could have been killed - he actually hotwired a floating ground that then energized an operators platform.

I find that the older I get the less forgiving I am. It is really hard to not wish ill on the a-holes of the world. At the same time I have learned that the negative thoughts only hurt me [negative energy if you will. I didn't want to get new-age about it]. I used hear that and never understood what it meant. It's true though. The bitterness can only turn inwards. I have really struggled over the last couple of years to move beyond anger as a response to injustices. The level of stress that I used to operate under was enough to kill a horse - and it was killing me. I had to let it go.

I guess the point is that there are many good reasons to get beyond the anger and "judgement" response - guilt, misperceptions, heart attacks, strokes - even if the offender richly deserves to be hated! :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Math Is Hard said:
And then there's that subtle but illogical gnawing feeling that perhaps you actually wished that person into the cornfield. <shudder>
Exactly. That's called "magical thinking" in psychology, and it's actually pretty common. I imagine it's something we believe as little kids that you never totally shake off as a adult. It comes into play in situations like this where there's a coincidental overlap between your general dislike of someone and something bad happening to them.
 
  • #23
For whatever reason, this woman did not deal with her situation in an open fashion. The possible reasons for this are myriad; they range from excess pride to timidity disguised as ferocity to paralyzed indecision, and from neurological complications of her illness to a lifelong habit of bitter contempt for those around her to dread of other people's pity. I'm not necessarily saying that she should have been more open about things, there is probably no good way for a person to judge that issue without an intimate knowledge of her circumstances. Nor am I suggesting that "openness" need consist of any more than making sure that the bare minimum facts become known in some indirect fashion. It just seems that, in the event, as things played out, she put herself effectively beyond the reach of other people's compassion.

Your reactions to this are, of course, your own. But from my point of view, it appears unnecessary to condemn yourself for not exhibiting a compassion that you have no way of knowing was even desired. Some misanthropes probably feel satisfaction at the idea that people might still curse them after they're gone.

Perhaps, one question to ask yourself might be: what if things had been as you expected? What if she had given a long speech delineating the sort of vermin she thought the Dean was descended from, and was promptly ejected with a well earned boot print on her backside? Do you judge that, in that case, your original schadenfreude was indefensible? At any given moment, we can only work with the information we have. In many cases, it is how we react to new information that counts.
 
Last edited:
  • #24
I guess the point is that there are many good reasons to get beyond the anger and "judgement" response - guilt, misperceptions, heart attacks, strokes - even if the offender richly deserves to be hated! :biggrin:
I guess I just haven't evolved to that point yet. I still have to work on that whole "water off a duck's back" response.
That's called "magical thinking" in psychology, and it's actually pretty common.
There really is an element in of that in there. It's like we never really trust that bad thoughts can't do damage to another person or another thing. It is probably especially hard for those of us who were brought up to say our prayers every night, basically to wish good things upon people we love. Of course it would seem natural that the opposite would work, and that we could send negative things rather than blessings. (even by accident)
Perhaps, one question to ask yourself might be: what if things had been as you expected?
I have been giving that a lot of thought, actually. This is what I see happening in the imaginary parallel universe where she didn't die, but only got fired. At first I am happy because she's been punished. Justice has finally been meted out, and universal karma is restored. :smile: But then I start to worry and my imagination starts developing all these horrible scenarios that make me feel sorry for her. What if she can't find another job? She wasn't all that young and the job market is awful. What if she can't pay her rent and loses her place to live? etc. :frown:
So ultimately I am unhappy with this ending too.
sigh. I can't win.
I have to figure out another ending where she learns her lesson but isn't harmed. This is why I never became a fiction writer. I'm terrrible with villains!
The other thing I've been questioning myself on is how would I have felt if she had been in perfect health and just gotten hit by a bus. I wonder if my sympathy would have been as deep if that had been the case? I think not.
 
  • #25
Some people will take illness as an opportunity to go in for a major bout of self-pity, and we shouldn't indulge them by pandering to them or letting them dump on us i.e. don't reinforce their dysfunctional behaviour. I'll leave it up to Saints and Buddhist types to have compassion for those who behave without compassion. I'm on the side of the French radio guy, Pierre Desproges, as it sounds like he didn't give in and showed us another way of dying. I don't know what he said, but I am guessing that he was provocative (thought provoking) rather than crude and unfeeling. And unlike a work colleague, if you don't like what he says you know where the dial is. However, I don't think any of us can judge him until we've heard what he said and the context in which he said it, but I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt based on what humanino said.

Speaking of ways of dealing with it, Bill Hicks was one of my favourite comics, and he just seemed to get a tad spiritual towards the end, as I recall.
 
  • #26
MIH, you're so sweet and you're being too hard on yourself.

I'm guilty of much worse. A few years ago a guy transferred into our department from another area. I knew this guy from the other department. He was one of those "pretty boys" that thought he could get along on looks alone. I couldn't stand him.

The guy was dumb as a rock and he was a huge brown noser.

He'd only been working a few weeks when he didn't show up for a monthly meeting on a Tuesday. He didn't call in. We couldn't reach him. But that was not too uncommon since we worked out of our homes and sometimes we'd have to rush out to see a client on short notice. It wasn't unusual for people to be unheard from for a few days, but not a "new" person.

Wednesday, no word from him., Thursday, no word. I started joking that he'd better be dead, because he was in serious trouble. I was so happy, our boss was going to fire him as soon as he showed up.

Well, they found his body that Saturday. Apparantly he had fallen down the steps in his house Monday night/Tuesday morning and broken his neck.

You can't beat yourself up for what you didn't know.
 
  • #27
For some reason, I keep getting images of people holding some kind of Irish wake for this woman, where a few (dozen) glasses are hoisted in her honor, alternating with people telling long stories about how rottenly she treated them, but how you had to respect that you always knew where you stood with her, even though it was generally true that the farther away you stood, the better; someone (could be a man or a woman) gets weepy and admits they were sweet on her; then there's an attempt to get a song going to sing her soul to peace, but by this point everyone's too drunk and the effort peters out as everyone falls asleep...
 
  • #28
Ivan Seeking said:
It seems to me that one possibility is overlooked in all of this. It is always possible that she was a terrible and nasty person. Your reactions might have been right on in spite of her illness. Even mean and nasty people get sick and die.

I don't mean to sound heartless or unsympathetic, but the assumption that while in good health, she was other than as you perceived, is unfounded.

This is the thought that first came to my mind as well. Math Is Hard, it sounds like you ARE a compassionate person, and nothing you said suggested you ever wished this woman harm despite her meanness to you. Your reaction to being asked to delete her accounts was that you were relieved thinking she was fired and finally going to stop berating you. There is no ill-intent to this. Illness is not an excuse to be mean-spirited. If anything, one would have hoped that woman would have learned the importance of enjoying life in her last days rather than holding onto such bitterness.

As a post-thought...another possibility of why this woman was so mean to the bitter end is that she didn't want pity. For her, it might have been better to have people dislike her and treat her like a normal, albeit mean, person rather than have people be extra-nice just because she was dying. And she may have been mean to protect others from getting to friendly with her and then being hurt when she died. Maybe your reaction was exactly how she wanted things to be. If you had known, perhaps your attempt at compassion would have been unwelcome, a sign of giving up on her. You treated her just like you would any other person who behaved the way she behaved, and that may have been the best thing you could have done for her.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
Evo said:
Well, they found his body that Saturday. Apparantly he had fallen down the steps in his house Monday night/Tuesday morning and broken his neck.

That's so sad for someone to be dead a week and not have any friends or family close enough to notice. :frown:
 
  • #30
# 42 you bring up some interesting points. There is no "Miss Manners Guide to Dying",
(and who really cares if there were) and we all get to choose to do our last days as we see fit.

Evo, thank you for sharing that story with me. It makes me feel less alone in this situation. It reminds me of a video I saw of a Cultural Anthropology grad student who came from a small tribe in Africa. He had come to the U.S. to study North American ways in Urban Society. He was completely floored that a situation could exist where someone could become homeless in our culture and not be taken in, or that someone in our society could pass away and this could go unnoticed for days.

plover, I have wondered what a tribute to her might be like. I am sure it is exactly as you described.

Moonbear, thank you for the insight, this is something I have not been considering.
Faced with death, a woman of her position and attitude would certainly not want sympathy or pity. Nothing could be more irksome.
And since she was considerably older than me, to establish her position of power, she probably came up through that philosophy of "if you want to compete in the boys club you better act as tough as you can or you'll never get respect". It was a different time then. I can see how she wouldn't want that undermined after all those years of hard work establishing this. And then there is the defense mechanism that you mentioned - that she might have alienated people in those last days to avoid hurting them in the end. There certainly is a valor in that.
Well, I suppose the best I can do is drink a toast in her honor, and I plan on doing so. I could do the traditional Franciscan penance of putting on the hair shirt and going out in the snow to flail myself, but snow is so hard to come by in Los Angeles. :biggrin:
 
  • #31
Math Is Hard said:
There really is an element in of that in there. It's like we never really trust that bad thoughts can't do damage to another person or another thing. It is probably especially hard for those of us who were brought up to say our prayers every night, basically to wish good things upon people we love. Of course it would seem natural that the opposite would work, and that we could send negative things rather than blessings. (even by accident)
Boy, you're right. I didn't even connect it to prayers when I suggested we learn it in childhood, but now that you mention it, that is probably where it gets reinforced the most: if praying for someone helps them, then it's natural to assume mental negativity toward them would have an authentic bad effect.

David Burns does an excercize with his cognitive therapy patients: he has them sit there and think bad thoughts about him for a while. At the end of it he always ends up just fine. They, however, may find themselves in a bad mood. Which demonstrates the point Ivan was making before: we are the ones who have to sit and listen to our negative thoughts. The other person is unaffected. It's usually not worth the stress.
 

FAQ: A Strange Kind of Shame: A Heartbreaking Story of Compassion and Understanding

1. What is the main theme of "A Strange Kind of Shame"?

The main theme of "A Strange Kind of Shame" is compassion and understanding. The story follows a young girl who is shamed by her community for her physical appearance, and how one person's act of kindness and understanding can change her life.

2. Is "A Strange Kind of Shame" based on a true story?

Yes, "A Strange Kind of Shame" is based on a true story. The author, who is a scientist, was inspired by a real-life experience of witnessing a young girl being shamed by her community.

3. How does the story portray the effects of shame on individuals?

The story portrays the damaging effects of shame on individuals, particularly on their self-esteem and self-worth. It shows how shame can lead to isolation, depression, and even self-harm.

4. What makes "A Strange Kind of Shame" a unique and important read?

"A Strange Kind of Shame" is a unique and important read because it sheds light on the power of compassion and understanding in overcoming shame and its effects. It also highlights the need for empathy and kindness in our society.

5. How does "A Strange Kind of Shame" relate to the field of science?

"A Strange Kind of Shame" relates to the field of science by exploring the psychological and social impacts of shame on individuals. It also emphasizes the importance of empathy and understanding in promoting mental and emotional well-being.

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
915
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top