A vertical U tube rotates about the vertical axis -- Find omega to cause this height offset

In summary, the problem involves a vertical U-tube rotating around a vertical axis, and the objective is to determine the angular velocity (omega) required to create a specific height difference between the two arms of the tube. The analysis considers the effects of centrifugal force on the fluid inside the tube, leading to an offset in fluid height that is influenced by the rotation speed. By applying principles of fluid dynamics and rotational motion, the relationship between omega and the height offset can be established.
  • #1
Aurelius120
251
24
Homework Statement
A vertical U tubes having a liquid rotation about the axis as shown. Then the angular velocity is
Relevant Equations
Force due to liquid column=##V\rho g##
Centripetal force on horizontal liquid =##m\omega^2r##
Area=A
1000017563.jpg

I thought I could use force balance as
$$V\rho g=m\omega^2r$$
But that gives two different values and neither correct
$$(Ab)\rho g=(Ab\rho)\omega^2 (b) \text{ on the left}$$
$$(A×3b)\rho g=(A×2b×\rho)\omega^2(2b) \text{ on the right}$$

Just in case, the answer in the book in B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The water in a horizontal section is not all at the same distance from the axis.
You seem to have assumed pressure at the axis is atmospheric.
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin
  • #3
haruspex said:
The water in a horizontal section is not all at the same distance from the axis.
You seem to have assumed pressure at the axis is atmospheric.
So I have to integrate or something?
Isn't the pressure atmospheric everywhere , so it doesn't affect the net results anywhere?
 
  • #4
Aurelius120 said:
So I have to integrate or something?
Yes.
Aurelius120 said:
Isn't the pressure atmospheric everywhere , so it doesn't affect the net results anywhere?
It can't be assumed atmospheric anywhere inside the water-filled sections.
You may not realise your equations assume that it is atmospheric in the water at the rotational axis.
 
  • #5
haruspex said:
Yes.

It can't be assumed atmospheric anywhere inside the water-filled sections.
You may not realise your equations assume that it is atmospheric in the water at the rotational axis.
So it will be
$$\int{\omega^2r dm}= V\rho g$$
On either side with limits ##0\text{ to }b## and ##0\text{ to }2b## and ##V## changed according to height of liquid column
 
  • #6
Aurelius120 said:
So it will be
$$\int{\omega^2r dm}= V\rho g$$
On either side with limits ##0\text{ to }b## and ##0\text{ to }2b## and ##V## changed according to height of liquid column
Better, but you still are not allowing an arbitrary pressure in the water at the axis.
 
  • #7
haruspex said:
Better, but you still are not allowing an arbitrary pressure in the water at the axis.
So how do I account for that? Its arbitrary so how to know its value
 
  • #8
Aurelius120 said:
So how do I account for that? Its arbitrary so how to know its value
There will be enough equations. Remember, in post #1 you had conflicting equations.
 
  • #9
Aurelius120 said:
I thought I could use force balance as
$$V\rho g=m\omega^2r$$
But that gives two different values and neither correct
Please, consider that at radius b, the shape of the curve must be symmetrical all around the vertical axis of rotation.
Therefore, "on the left" is similar to "on the right" anywhere between the axis of rotation and the radius b (concentric rotation).

There is balance within that range of radii.
There is nothing to balance the rotating mass located between the radius b and 2b (excentric rotation).

Perhaps "force balance" is not the way to the solution.
Which shown option satisfies that the height is triple (3b) when the radius is double (2b)?
 
  • #10
Lnewqban said:
Perhaps "force balance" is not the way to the solution.
It is a perfectly reasonable way.
Lnewqban said:
Which shown option satisfies that the height is triple (3b) when the radius is double (2b)?
Since one option is "none of the above" you can't use that shortcut.
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
It is a perfectly reasonable way.

Since one option is "none of the above" you can't use that shortcut.
I think I got it
$$\int^b_0{\omega^2 A\rho rdr}-PA=A(b)\rho g$$
$$\int^{2b}_0{\omega^2A\rho rdr}-PA=A(3b)\rho g$$
Therefore
Subtracting equation 1 from 2
$$\frac{3A\rho\omega^2b^2}{2}=2Ab\rho g$$
 
  • #12
Lnewqban said:
Please, consider that at radius b, the shape of the curve must be symmetrical all around the vertical axis of rotation.
Therefore, "on the left" is similar to "on the right" anywhere between the axis of rotation and the radius b (concentric rotation).

There is balance within that range of radii.
There is nothing to balance the rotating mass located between the radius b and 2b (excentric rotation).

Perhaps "force balance" is not the way to the solution.
Which shown option satisfies that the height is triple (3b) when the radius is double (2b)?
I am not sure I understand. The water can't be treated as rectangular/cylindrical blocks with forces ##V\rho g## on either side and arbitrary force due pressure in-between❓
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Aurelius120 said:
I think I got it
$$\int^b_0{\omega^2 A\rho rdr}-PA=A(b)\rho g$$
$$\int^{2b}_0{\omega^2A\rho rdr}-PA=A(3b)\rho g$$
Therefore
Subtracting equation 1 from 2
$$\frac{3A\rho\omega^2b^2}{2}=2Ab\rho g$$
Yes, except that the balance is of pressures, not forces. You don’t need A in there. In fact, if the cross-sectional area of the horizontal tube were different from that of the vertical tubes then having those two different areas in your equation would lead to an incorrect result.
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
Yes, except that the balance is of pressures, not forces. You don’t need A in there. In fact, if the cross-sectional area of the horizontal tube were different from that of the vertical tubes then having those two different areas in your equation would lead to an incorrect result.
But isn't it equating the force required for rotation to force exerted? I don't know if there is something like Centripetal pressure that is necessary for rotation
 
  • #15
Aurelius120 said:
But isn't it equating the force required for rotation to force exerted? I don't know if there is something like Centripetal pressure that is necessary for rotation
It is just like gravity, except that it is horizontal and varies along the length of the tube.
Suppose the horizontal tube were to vary in cross section, starting wide at the axis then narrowing. Where the sides of the tube go inwards, they would take some of the total centrifugal force. What is reliably transmitted to the next bit of fluid is the pressure.
 
  • Like
Likes Aurelius120
  • #16
Aurelius120 said:
ωI am not sure I understand. The water can't be treated as rectangular/cylindrical blocks with forces ##V\rho g## on either side and arbitrary force due pressure in-between❓
Apologies for not being able to explain myself in a clearer way, as well as for late response.
Those forces acting on the block must be associated with its cross-section areas and with the static pressure acting on each side.

Besides the correct Math solution, did you get a full understanding of the physics behind the different levels reached by the liquid in each branch due to rotation with angular velocity ω?

Please, see:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-osuniversityphysics/chapter/14-1-fluids-density-and-pressure/


CNX_UPhysics_Figure_14_01_VarDensity.jpg
 

FAQ: A vertical U tube rotates about the vertical axis -- Find omega to cause this height offset

What is a vertical U tube and how does it function in this context?

A vertical U tube is a device consisting of a U-shaped tube that is oriented vertically, typically filled with a fluid. When the tube rotates about its vertical axis, the centrifugal force acting on the fluid creates a pressure difference between the two arms of the tube, leading to a height offset of the fluid levels in each arm.

What is the significance of the angular velocity (omega) in this scenario?

The angular velocity (omega) is crucial because it determines the strength of the centrifugal force acting on the fluid within the U tube. By calculating the appropriate value of omega, one can achieve a specific height offset between the two arms of the tube, which is essential for understanding fluid dynamics in rotating systems.

How do you derive the equation to find the angular velocity (omega)?

The equation to find the angular velocity can be derived from the balance of forces acting on the fluid in the U tube. By applying the principles of fluid statics and dynamics, one can equate the centrifugal force to the hydrostatic pressure difference caused by the height offset. This results in an equation that relates omega to the height difference and other parameters such as fluid density and gravitational acceleration.

What factors influence the height offset in the U tube?

The height offset in the U tube is influenced by several factors, including the fluid density, the radius of the tube, the angular velocity (omega), and the gravitational acceleration. Changes in any of these parameters will affect the balance of forces and, consequently, the height difference between the two arms of the tube.

Can the height offset be controlled or adjusted in a practical application?

Yes, the height offset can be controlled or adjusted by varying the angular velocity (omega) of the U tube's rotation. Additionally, altering the fluid type or changing the tube dimensions can also impact the height offset, allowing for precise manipulation in practical applications such as in centrifugal pumps or fluid management systems.

Similar threads

Back
Top