About writing a unitary matrix in another way

In summary, the conversation discusses the properties of an unitary matrix and how it can be represented in a given form. The conversation then explores how to show that a matrix satisfies a certain condition by taking the most general matrix and imposing the condition on it. The conversation also mentions using the standard formula to find the inverse of a matrix and using the hermitian to determine the relationships between the matrix's elements.
  • #1
aalma
46
1
It is easy to see that a matrix of the given form is actually an unitary matrix i,e, satisfying AA^*=I with determinant 1. But, how to see that an unitary matrix can be represented in the given way?
20230322_224305.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Take the most general matrix,
$$
A =
\begin{bmatrix}
a + bi & c + di \\
e+ fi & g+hi
\end{bmatrix}
$$
and show that imposing ##AA^\dagger = I## requires ##e = -c##, ##f=d##, and so on.
 
  • Like
Likes aalma and topsquark
  • #3
Yes, thanks. Tried to do this however got somehow long equations with these eight real numbers. guessing how it should be solved!
I also wrote the condition that the det of this matrix=1.
 
  • #4
Can't you just find the inverse of the matrix using the standard formula, and then you do the hermitian of the matrix and thus figure out what the relationsships of a, b, c, ... must be?

##A^\dagger = A^{-1}##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes aalma and DrClaude

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
588
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top