- #1
wnvl2
- 45
- 13
- TL;DR Summary
- Clarification sought for the absolute meaning of the deviaton angle of light as calculated by Einstein around the sun
Einstein first calculated the bending of light rays that are touching the sun as 1.75 arc-sec. For the calculation I refer e.g. to https://www.mathpages.com/rr/s8-09/8-09.htm
I know that spatial angles in general relativity don’t have an intrinsic value (are not invariant). They are dependent on the choice of the coordinate system. Angles can be calculated using
$$\cos\theta = \frac{a^{i}b_{i}}{\sqrt{a^{i}a_{i}b^{i}b_{i}}}$$
with i indexing only the spatial components.
I would have expected that the outcome is determined by the chosen coordinate system with associated metrics and that his value has no physical meaning if you don't know which coordinate system + associated metric was chosen. But apparently that 1.75 arc sec seems to have some absolute meaning without having to specify the coordinate system. Is there any assumption I am missing?
In this context I would also like to refer to Einstein’s hole argument. By changing the coordinate system in a hole I would expect to obtain a different total deflection angle.
I know that spatial angles in general relativity don’t have an intrinsic value (are not invariant). They are dependent on the choice of the coordinate system. Angles can be calculated using
$$\cos\theta = \frac{a^{i}b_{i}}{\sqrt{a^{i}a_{i}b^{i}b_{i}}}$$
with i indexing only the spatial components.
I would have expected that the outcome is determined by the chosen coordinate system with associated metrics and that his value has no physical meaning if you don't know which coordinate system + associated metric was chosen. But apparently that 1.75 arc sec seems to have some absolute meaning without having to specify the coordinate system. Is there any assumption I am missing?
In this context I would also like to refer to Einstein’s hole argument. By changing the coordinate system in a hole I would expect to obtain a different total deflection angle.