MHB Absolute Value Statements....2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rewriting statements using absolute values. The first statement, "The number y is less than one unit from the number t," is correctly expressed as |t - y| < 1. The second statement regarding the sum of distances is clarified; the correct formulation is |a| + |b| ≥ |a + b|, rather than the initially proposed expression. Participants confirm that the rewording of the first statement is accurate. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of correctly applying absolute value concepts in mathematical expressions.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Rewrite each statement using absolute values.

1. The number y is less than one unit from the number t.

y < | t - 1 |

2. The sum of the distances of a and b from the origin is greater than or equal to the distance of a + b from the origin.

| a + b - 0 | > or = | a + b - 0 |

Is this correct? If not, why not?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Rewrite each statement using absolute values.

1. The number y is less than one unit from the number t.

y < | t - 1 |

What if this is reworded to say the same thing, but in the form you had no trouble with:

"The distance between y and t is less than 1 unit" ?

RTCNTC said:
2. The sum of the distances of a and b from the origin is greater than or equal to the distance of a + b from the origin.

| a + b - 0 | > or = | a + b - 0 |

Is this correct? If not, why not?

This isn't correct...the sum of the distances of a and b from the origin would be:

$$|a|+|b|$$

And the distance of the sum a + b from the origin is:

$$|a+b|$$

And so we would write:

$$|a|+|b|\ge|a+b|$$
 
"The distance between y and t is less than 1 unit" ?

| t - y | < 1 or | y - t | < 1

Yes?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top