Why Are Absorption Cross Sections Larger for Atoms Than for Molecules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Plane Wave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absorption Cross
Click For Summary
Absorption cross sections for atoms are significantly larger than those for molecules due to differences in their electronic and vibrational states. For instance, the absorption cross section for Rubidium's D2 line is approximately 1E-9 cm^2, while that for I2 is around 9 orders of magnitude smaller. This disparity arises because molecules possess multiple ground states and a greater number of thermally populated states, which complicates the excitation process. Additionally, the excited states of molecules often have shorter lifetimes due to non-radiative relaxation, further reducing their absorption efficiency compared to atomic states. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurately comparing absorption properties between atoms and molecules.
Plane Wave
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Why are absorption cross sections for atoms so much larger than that of molecules.

For example, the absorption cross section for the D2 line in Rubidium is ~1E-9 cm^2. Specifically, the cross section is basically σ~λ^2

The absorption cross sections for say, I2, is 9 orders of magnitude smaller! Briefly looking through many of the molecular spectra, all of the cross sections are on order of 10E-18 cm^2 to 10E-19 cm^2.

I2_400-800nm_lin.jpg

http://joseba.mpch-mainz.mpg.de/spe.../Halogens+mixed halogens/I2_400-800nm_lin.jpg

Does anyone know why the absorption cross section for molecular transitions are so much smaller than the atomic absorption cross section?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider what "absorption" entails. What actually happens at the atomic level in each case you are considering?
What is the essential difference between an atom in a molecule and an atom by itself with regard to the process?
 
My best answer, which I didn't want to put in the original post to corrupt future responses, was the molecule has many possible ground states and the absorption cross section includes the probability the excitation electron happens to be in that vibrational and rotational state.

Is that what your questions are implying?
 
I forgot to add that I think there should be something else. There maybe 100 or so discrete thermally populated states from which the molecule can be excited. That's only 2 orders of magnitude instead of 9.
 
The questions are guiding for you and formative for me - I was hoping to focus your attention on the physical effects behind the equations while learning more about how you think ;)

Note: if you want to compare crossections between atoms and molecules - you should compare like with like: i.e. H vs H2 rather than Ru with I2. I expect you'd get different results for Iodine crystals too.

Did you notice that the crossections increased for pure iodine when there was air in the sample (red)? Apart from that your graph shows only measured spectra for I2.
 
The lifetime of the excited state (usually a high order vibrational state which relaxes by non-radiative transfer) is orders of magnitude smaller than the radiative lifetime of atomic electronic levels which accounts for the difference in absorption cross section.
 
A relative asked me about the following article: Experimental observation of a time rondeau crystal https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-025-03028-y I pointed my relative to following article: Scientists Discovered a Time Crystal That Reveals a New Way to Order Time https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/scientists-discovered-time-crystal-reveals-180055389.html This area is outside of my regular experience. I'm interested in radiation effects in polycrystalline material, i.e., grain...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K