- #1
magnethead494
- 28
- 0
Spreadsheet of data: http://i1105.photobucket.com/albums/h355/magnethead494/Screenshot2012-05-14at103445PM.png
Example dyno graph: http://i1105.photobucket.com/albums/h355/magnethead494/turbo_busa_dyno_hahn_stg1.jpg
I'm familiar with F = MA/G => F*G/M = A for english units (G = 32.17).
This works for accelerating from a standstill (IE, approx'ing to top of first gear),
160 ft-lb * 1.596 primary * 2.615 first gear * 4.0625 chain drive = 2,712 ft-lb at the axle
2,712 * 12 inches / 13.25 inch rolling radius = 2,456 pound force
2,456 pound-force / 700 pound-weight = 3.50 G-forces = 112.87 feet per second squared average acceleration
I know that seems like a high acceleration, but for a 300HP 700 pound machine, that's a 2.3 pound-per-HP ratio.
And the formula
(Vf)2 = (V0)2 + 2ad
for subsequent gears... But I don't know x.
Applying that formula to previous calculation,
(75.68 feet/sec)2 = (0MPH)2 + 2 * 112.87 fps2 * d
5,727.4624 feet2 per second2 = 225.74 fps2 * d
5,727.4624 feet2 per second2 / 225.74 feet per second2 = 25.372 feet to the top of first gear (AKA 25.372 feet to 51.6 miles per hour, at average 3.5G's)But how can I calculate the acceleration for subsequent gears?
I'm going to state my 3-part hypothesis..am I right or wrong?
Part 1: Using F=Ma to get acceleration per gear
Expanded:
top of gear:
primary * chain = 6.48375
rolling radius multiplier = 0.88888
Engine Torque at 10,500 RPM: 160 ft-lb
Composite value = 160 * 6.48375 * 0.8888888 = 922.13333
1st: 922.1333 * 2.615 / 700 * 32.17 = 110.82 feet per second squared (3.44G)
2nd: 922.1333 * 1.937 / 700 * 32.17 = 82.08 feet per second squared (2.55G)
3rd: 922.1333 * 1.526 / 700 * 32.17 = 64.67 feet per second squared (2.01G)
4th: 922.1333 * 1.285 / 700 * 32.17 = 54.45 feet per second squared (1.69G)
5th: 922.1333 * 1.136 / 700 * 32.17 = 48.14 feet per second squared (1.50G)
6th: 922.1333 * 1.043 / 700 * 32.17 = 44.20 feet per second squared (1.37G)
Part 2: Getting the distance per gear
1st: 75.682 = 02 + 2 * 110.82 * d => 5,727.46/221.64 = 25.84ft
2nd: 102.182 = 75.682 + 2 * 82.08 * d => 10,440.75 - 5,727.46 = 164.16 * d => 4,713.29 / 165.16 = 28.53ft
3rd: 129.712 = 102.182 + 2 * 64.67 * d => 16,824.68 - 10,440.75 = 129.34 * d => 6,383.93 / 129.34 = 49.35ft
4th: 154.032 = 129.712 + 2 * 54.45 * d => 23,725.24 - 16,824.68 = 108.90 * d => 6,900.56 / 108.90 = 63.36ft
5th: 174.242 = 154.032 + 2 * 48.14 * d => 30,359.58 - 23,725.24 = 96.28 * d => 6,634.04 / 96.28 = 68.90ft
6th: 189.77 = 174.242 + 2 * 44.20 * d => 36,012.65 - 30,359.58 = 88.40 * d => 5,653.07 / 88.40 = 63.95ft
25.84 + 28.5 + 49.35 + 63.36 + 68.90 + 63.95 = 299.9 feet (should equal something near 660ft)
Something is clearly wrong with the calculation...but what is it? The G forces seem realistic, the MPH calculations (spreadsheet and google to FPS calcs) seem correct, what else could be wrong?
Part 3: getting the time per gear
d = t/2 * (Vf+V0)
1st: 75.682 = 02 + (2 * 110.82 * t/2 * (75.68 + 0)) => 5,727.46 = 8,386.86 * t => 0.683 seconds
2nd: 102.182 = 75.682 + (2 * 82.08 * t/2 * (102.18 + 75.68)) => 10,440.75 = 5,727.46 + 14,598.75t => 0.323 seconds
3rd: 129.712 = 102.182 + (2 * 64.67 * t/2 * (129.71 + 102.18)) => 16,824.68 = 10,440.75 + 14,996.33t => 0.426 seconds
4th: 154.032 = 129.712 + (2 * 54.45 * t/2 * (154.03 + 129.71)) => 23,725.24 = 16,824.68 + 15,449.64t => 0.447 seconds
5th: 174.242 = 154.032 + (2 * 48.14 * t/2 * (174.24 + 154.03)) => 30,359.58 = 23,725.24 + 15,802.92t => 0.420 seconds
6th: 189.77 = 174.242 + (2 * 44.20 * t/2 * (189.77 + 174.24)) => 36,012.65 = 30,359.58 + 16,089.24t => 0.351 seconds
0.683 + 0.323 + 0.426 + 0.447 + 0.420 + 0.351 = 2.65 seconds (should equal something near 4.95 seconds)
Again, something is clearly wrong. I have a feeling it's in the main equation...(Vf)2 = (V0)2 + 2ad
A = G * F/m
d = t/2 * (Vf+V0)
If someone could point my mistakes, it would be appreciated.
Example dyno graph: http://i1105.photobucket.com/albums/h355/magnethead494/turbo_busa_dyno_hahn_stg1.jpg
I'm familiar with F = MA/G => F*G/M = A for english units (G = 32.17).
This works for accelerating from a standstill (IE, approx'ing to top of first gear),
160 ft-lb * 1.596 primary * 2.615 first gear * 4.0625 chain drive = 2,712 ft-lb at the axle
2,712 * 12 inches / 13.25 inch rolling radius = 2,456 pound force
2,456 pound-force / 700 pound-weight = 3.50 G-forces = 112.87 feet per second squared average acceleration
I know that seems like a high acceleration, but for a 300HP 700 pound machine, that's a 2.3 pound-per-HP ratio.
And the formula
(Vf)2 = (V0)2 + 2ad
for subsequent gears... But I don't know x.
Applying that formula to previous calculation,
(75.68 feet/sec)2 = (0MPH)2 + 2 * 112.87 fps2 * d
5,727.4624 feet2 per second2 = 225.74 fps2 * d
5,727.4624 feet2 per second2 / 225.74 feet per second2 = 25.372 feet to the top of first gear (AKA 25.372 feet to 51.6 miles per hour, at average 3.5G's)But how can I calculate the acceleration for subsequent gears?
I'm going to state my 3-part hypothesis..am I right or wrong?
Part 1: Using F=Ma to get acceleration per gear
Expanded:
top of gear:
primary * chain = 6.48375
rolling radius multiplier = 0.88888
Engine Torque at 10,500 RPM: 160 ft-lb
Composite value = 160 * 6.48375 * 0.8888888 = 922.13333
1st: 922.1333 * 2.615 / 700 * 32.17 = 110.82 feet per second squared (3.44G)
2nd: 922.1333 * 1.937 / 700 * 32.17 = 82.08 feet per second squared (2.55G)
3rd: 922.1333 * 1.526 / 700 * 32.17 = 64.67 feet per second squared (2.01G)
4th: 922.1333 * 1.285 / 700 * 32.17 = 54.45 feet per second squared (1.69G)
5th: 922.1333 * 1.136 / 700 * 32.17 = 48.14 feet per second squared (1.50G)
6th: 922.1333 * 1.043 / 700 * 32.17 = 44.20 feet per second squared (1.37G)
Part 2: Getting the distance per gear
1st: 75.682 = 02 + 2 * 110.82 * d => 5,727.46/221.64 = 25.84ft
2nd: 102.182 = 75.682 + 2 * 82.08 * d => 10,440.75 - 5,727.46 = 164.16 * d => 4,713.29 / 165.16 = 28.53ft
3rd: 129.712 = 102.182 + 2 * 64.67 * d => 16,824.68 - 10,440.75 = 129.34 * d => 6,383.93 / 129.34 = 49.35ft
4th: 154.032 = 129.712 + 2 * 54.45 * d => 23,725.24 - 16,824.68 = 108.90 * d => 6,900.56 / 108.90 = 63.36ft
5th: 174.242 = 154.032 + 2 * 48.14 * d => 30,359.58 - 23,725.24 = 96.28 * d => 6,634.04 / 96.28 = 68.90ft
6th: 189.77 = 174.242 + 2 * 44.20 * d => 36,012.65 - 30,359.58 = 88.40 * d => 5,653.07 / 88.40 = 63.95ft
25.84 + 28.5 + 49.35 + 63.36 + 68.90 + 63.95 = 299.9 feet (should equal something near 660ft)
Something is clearly wrong with the calculation...but what is it? The G forces seem realistic, the MPH calculations (spreadsheet and google to FPS calcs) seem correct, what else could be wrong?
Part 3: getting the time per gear
d = t/2 * (Vf+V0)
1st: 75.682 = 02 + (2 * 110.82 * t/2 * (75.68 + 0)) => 5,727.46 = 8,386.86 * t => 0.683 seconds
2nd: 102.182 = 75.682 + (2 * 82.08 * t/2 * (102.18 + 75.68)) => 10,440.75 = 5,727.46 + 14,598.75t => 0.323 seconds
3rd: 129.712 = 102.182 + (2 * 64.67 * t/2 * (129.71 + 102.18)) => 16,824.68 = 10,440.75 + 14,996.33t => 0.426 seconds
4th: 154.032 = 129.712 + (2 * 54.45 * t/2 * (154.03 + 129.71)) => 23,725.24 = 16,824.68 + 15,449.64t => 0.447 seconds
5th: 174.242 = 154.032 + (2 * 48.14 * t/2 * (174.24 + 154.03)) => 30,359.58 = 23,725.24 + 15,802.92t => 0.420 seconds
6th: 189.77 = 174.242 + (2 * 44.20 * t/2 * (189.77 + 174.24)) => 36,012.65 = 30,359.58 + 16,089.24t => 0.351 seconds
0.683 + 0.323 + 0.426 + 0.447 + 0.420 + 0.351 = 2.65 seconds (should equal something near 4.95 seconds)
Again, something is clearly wrong. I have a feeling it's in the main equation...(Vf)2 = (V0)2 + 2ad
A = G * F/m
d = t/2 * (Vf+V0)
If someone could point my mistakes, it would be appreciated.