Achieving the speed of light at the end of a whip

In summary, the conversation is about the possibility of a whip reaching the speed of light with enough energy and length. However, it is scientifically proven that the end of an object, including a whip, cannot exceed the speed of light due to the laws of relativistic mechanics. The material of the whip is not a factor in this limitation. The conversation also discusses the concept of phase velocity and the limitations of material at high speeds. The conversation concludes with the explanation of why a whip cracks and the reason behind the sonic boom.
  • #1
idktbh1
2
0
Is there a equation for the speed at the end of the whip.
is there a consistent way to calculate how fast the tip of the whip will be including constant velocity and trajectory or is it chaotic.
Im new to physics and had a thought that with enough legnth and power a wiphs end colud reach the speed of light without using infinate energy... i don't know if that's the case . I am very invested in this any help wolud be appreciated!My logic is that we use little energy to brake the sound barrier with a whip that it colud be possible to reach the speed of light.
The material of the whip is not a factor. Its ruled out because no material can withstand the speed of light and bend like a whip.
Im just looking for theroetical evidance for this!
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
The end of an object is accelerated by the part of the object next to it. If you focus on the end of a whip, its motion is governed by the laws of relativistic mechanics and cannot achieve the speed of light. There is no fundamental difference between the end of a whip and any other object.
 
  • Like
Likes idktbh1
  • #3
PeroK said:
The end of an object is accelerated by the part of the object next to it. If you focus on the end of a whip, its motion is governed by the laws of relativistic mechanics and cannot achieve the speed of light. There is no fundamental difference between the end of a whip and any other object.
this is very demotivating but thank you very much !
 
  • #4
idktbh1 said:
this is very demotivating but thank you very much !
All is not lost. There is still some hope.
When a wavefront crosses or is reflected by a line, the locus of the point of contact of wavefront and line, moves at a speed between that of the wavefront and infinity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wave#Phase_velocity
"The superluminal phase velocity does not violate special relativity, because phase propagation carries no energy".
 
  • #5
Just for info, the material at the end of the whip needs to reach twice the speed of sound in order for the 'crack' to occur.
PeroK's reply is accurate. Even given a hypothetical material of infinite strength (something physics forbids), no amount of energy could move any part of it locally at light speed. I say locally because plenty of things move faster than light non-locally. A neutrino passes between Alpha-Centauri and here at possibly faster than light as measured by either us or them, but not as measured by something in the current proximity of the neutrino. The difference is that we're all using different clocks that run at different rates due to differences in the gravitational potential of each observation point.

So with enough energy and a deep enough gravity well for your observation point (lawn-chair on a neutron star seems like a good spot, don't forget the ice tea), the speed of the whip tip can indeed exceed c, but will still not outpace nearby light moving in the same direction.
 
  • #6
idktbh1 said:
this is very demotivating but thank you very much !
Finding out news things shouldn't be 'demotivating'. Science is a journey, littered with occasions when one finds out one is wrong. Accepting that you need to modify your view according to evidence is healthy.
 
  • Like
Likes hmmm27 and phinds
  • #7
idktbh1 said:
The material of the whip is not a factor. Its ruled out because no material can withstand the speed of light and bend like a whip.
Mass'y material can't do light speed.
idktbh1 said:
this is very demotivating but thank you very much !
Better now than when you've spent a fortune trying to develop a whip that can't work.

Also : spellcheck, spellcheck, spellcheck, spellcheck...

Halc said:
Just for info, the material at the end of the whip needs to reach twice the speed of sound in order for the 'crack' to occur.

Don't leave us hanging... why ?
 
  • #8
hmmm27 said:
Halc said:
Just for info, the material at the end of the whip needs to reach twice the speed of sound in order for the 'crack' to occur.
Don't leave us hanging... why ?
The technique seems to be to form a loop in the whip and propagate that down the ever-thinning length of the thing. So conservation of energy and momentum has the loop 'wave' moving faster and faster as the mass density of the whip goes down towards the end. The tiny sonic boom occurs if the loop can be made to move at supersonic speeds. Since it is a loop, the top of it moves at twice the speed just like the top of the wheel of a car moves at twice the speed of the car. A car does not make a sonic boom at 650 km/hr even though the top of its wheels are moving at supersonic speeds.
 
  • Like
Likes hmmm27
  • #9
Now I am wondering if the ritual of snapping of towels in the gym was producing a sonic boom.
There was evidently no loop in the towel.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #10
256bits said:
Now I am wondering if the ritual of snapping of towels in the gym was producing a sonic boom.
There was evidently no loop in the towel.
"Evidently"? You would need a slomo camera, close up, to observe the shape at the end of a towel. Afair, the effect was best with the towel operated 'diagonally', with a corner at the end; ideal for producing a small loop and a high speed. Ahhh those were the days.

EDIT: PS, I just remembered the same sort of horseplay with my sons in the kitchen when they should have been drying dishes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 256bits
  • #11
sophiecentaur said:
"Evidently"?
Not the same type of loop as the 'one coil loop' ( it is kind of like a twist was put into the whip somehow ) that travels down the bullwhip that they use to analyse the bullwhip - not sure if every bullwhip user produces that type, but they ( who is they ? and why ) presume so.

The towel loop would not have that type of coil - it would be simply a halved towel where one end unfurls, and the tip of that end accelerates and the length common to the tip shortens.
 
  • #12
So if Indiana Jones is standing on top of a train moving at 0.999999999999999999999C, calculate the gamma factors along the length of his whip from the frame of reference of his intended target bad guy standing beside the track

(actually please don't)
 
  • #13
256bits said:
Not the same type of loop as the 'one coil loop' ( it is kind of like a twist was put into the whip somehow ) that travels down the bullwhip that they use to analyse the bullwhip - not sure if every bullwhip user produces that type, but they ( who is they ? and why ) presume so.

The towel loop would not have that type of coil - it would be simply a halved towel where one end unfurls, and the tip of that end accelerates and the length common to the tip shortens.
I made an assumption that the shape of the wave traveling along the whip / towel would be a simple transverse semi-loop (U shape). If anything else was meant then I would have expected a diagram as explanation. A photo image of that would constitute evidence.
 
  • Like
Likes 256bits and hmmm27
  • #15
idktbh1 said:
Is there a equation for the speed at the end of the whip?

If such an equation exists, it would likely be Newtonian and ignore relativity. Getting a whip to move fast enough that relativity becomes relevant sounds... unlikely. Putting big numbers into a Newtonian equation might produce an answer faster than light. But as others here have said, what would really happen is that the energy you put into the whip would just go into making it's effective mass higher, and then tearing the whip apart.
 
  • #16
Nice video of a whip in slow motion :
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes jrmichler and hmmm27

FAQ: Achieving the speed of light at the end of a whip

How is it possible to achieve the speed of light at the end of a whip?

Achieving the speed of light at the end of a whip is not currently possible. The speed of light is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second, which is extremely difficult to achieve in any physical object, let alone a whip. This is due to the laws of physics and the limitations of our current technology.

Can a whip really break the sound barrier?

Yes, a whip can break the sound barrier. This is known as a sonic boom and occurs when the tip of the whip moves faster than the speed of sound, which is approximately 343 meters per second. However, this is still significantly slower than the speed of light.

Is there any scientific research on achieving the speed of light with a whip?

There is currently no scientific research or evidence to suggest that achieving the speed of light at the end of a whip is possible. This concept is often seen in science fiction and is not supported by scientific principles.

Can the material of the whip affect its speed?

Yes, the material of the whip can affect its speed. A lighter and more flexible material, such as nylon, will allow the whip to move faster than a heavier and stiffer material, such as leather. However, even with the most optimal material, achieving the speed of light is still not possible.

Are there any potential dangers of attempting to achieve the speed of light with a whip?

Attempting to achieve the speed of light with a whip is not only impossible, but it could also be extremely dangerous. The force required to move an object at the speed of light is immense and could cause serious harm to both the user and anyone nearby. It is important to stick to the laws of physics and not attempt to achieve the impossible.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
14K
Replies
54
Views
7K
Replies
36
Views
26K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Back
Top