MHB Advanced Problem-Solving Strategies

AI Thread Summary
Advanced problem-solving strategies are essential for tackling complex issues, as no single method is universally applicable. The discussion highlights the importance of organizing work using structured approaches, referencing a problem-solving strategy adapted from Young and Freedman's University Physics. It emphasizes the value of George Polya's classic book "How to Solve It," which is recommended for mathematicians and engineers, along with Michalewicz and Fogel's "How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics," which builds on Polya's ideas. Additionally, the TRIZ methodology is suggested as a resource for innovative problem-solving techniques. Overall, these resources provide a foundation for enhancing problem-solving skills across various disciplines.
Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
93
I intend for this post to serve as one place to get ideas (the vast majority of which are quite unoriginal with me). Naturally, no one solution method can possibly work for every problem. I would argue that such a solution method does not exist. However, the ideas that so many people have culled together over time may be of use to you, and so I present a few of them here.

Firstly, the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?28-Problem-Solving-Strategy is a great way to organize your work. It might even work well for more advanced problems. Naturally, not every step will necessarily apply to every problem. This strategy is modified a bit from the problem-solving strategy found in Young and Freedman's University Physics with Modern Physics.

Secondly, there is the famous George Polya book How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. This is a classic work that every mathematician, scientist, and engineer should read.

Thirdly, I would also highly recommend Michalewicz and Fogel's How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics. This book attempts to pick up where Polya left off; it has some delightful passages.

Finally, I would recommend looking into the http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1997/07/b/index.html. I think there are some great ideas there. Once you've read the link in the previous sentence, you might also want to check out the TRIZ Matrix, where each principle is matched up with the contradictions it might be able to solve.

<defunct URL removed>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top