- #1
Rippling Hysteresis
- 24
- 0
- TL;DR Summary
- I'd like greatly improve proficiency in MV/vector calc and am seeking advice on the best path forward. I'll know I have reached my goal when I can pick up any random professor's problem set and be able to construct a plan and recognize fundamental concepts underlying the problem.
I've taken multivariable/vector calc and can do most of the basic operations and have an OK understanding of the fundamental concepts, but certainly can't "see it" like I can calc I and II. In those subjects, I often feel competent to take on any problem I come across because the concepts are strong. If relevant, I have an undergrad background in physics from years past, so have some familiarity with some of the basic applications.
What would people recommend to build up my conceptual grasp and widen the scope of problems I can jump into? For example, if I work through a particular textbook, even semi-rigorous ones like Marsden and Tromba, I can handle the majority of the problems. But when faced with a problem set I come across online from one professor or another, it's hard to jump in and attack them. I'm sure if I had sat in any individual professor's class and seen the way they've set up problems and the such I'd be able to do it, but I don't have that general competency yet without a model of an instructor's approach.
Is there a good a good set of problems that have a wide scope and a variety of situations or ways that the standard computations can be set-up, modeled, applied, etc. (and include solutions) that anyone would recommend? The goal is to have general and fluid skills so that I could develop the ability to see the path forward for any vector calc type problems, so I'm not limiting myself to one modality. I will say I'm not as interested in the real analysis/proof-based approach-- I hesitate to take that route because I don't see myself following through in a serious way for such an undertaking.
Very much excited to hear what people would recommend!
What would people recommend to build up my conceptual grasp and widen the scope of problems I can jump into? For example, if I work through a particular textbook, even semi-rigorous ones like Marsden and Tromba, I can handle the majority of the problems. But when faced with a problem set I come across online from one professor or another, it's hard to jump in and attack them. I'm sure if I had sat in any individual professor's class and seen the way they've set up problems and the such I'd be able to do it, but I don't have that general competency yet without a model of an instructor's approach.
Is there a good a good set of problems that have a wide scope and a variety of situations or ways that the standard computations can be set-up, modeled, applied, etc. (and include solutions) that anyone would recommend? The goal is to have general and fluid skills so that I could develop the ability to see the path forward for any vector calc type problems, so I'm not limiting myself to one modality. I will say I'm not as interested in the real analysis/proof-based approach-- I hesitate to take that route because I don't see myself following through in a serious way for such an undertaking.
Very much excited to hear what people would recommend!