MHB Aesity's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a geometric sequence

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a geometric sequence problem where the first term is 27 and the sixth term is 512/9. To find the seventh term, the common ratio (r) is calculated using the formula for the nth term, leading to r being approximately 0.4214. The seventh term is then derived as 27 multiplied by r raised to the sixth power, resulting in a complex fraction. Additionally, the sum of the first five terms is computed using the formula for the sum of a geometric series, yielding a specific expression involving r. The calculations demonstrate the method for determining terms and sums in geometric sequences.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Geometric sequence question?

The first term of a geometric sequence is 27 and the sixth term is 512/9.

1) Find the seventh term

I have problem with this working. Either the calculator is pulling a false one on me or IDK.
Since 512/9 = 27r^(6-1)
then (512/9) / 27 = r^5
r^5=512/243
r= (512/243) ^ 1/5
What I got for r was 0.421399177

To arrive at the seventh term; 27(0.421399177)^(7-1). I got 0.15119
This is no where close to the answer but apparently there doesn't appear to be any anomalies with my workings. 2) Find the sum of the first five terms of this sequence.

I need explanations behind the workings. Thanks!

Here is a link to the question:

Geometric sequence question? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Aesity's question at Yahoo! Ansers regarding a geometric sequence

Hello Aesity,

We are given:

$\displaystyle a_1=27$

$\displaystyle a_6=\frac{512}{9}$

The $n$th term in the sequence is:

$\displaystyle a_n=27r^{n-1}$

and so we may determine $r$ by writing:

$\displaystyle a_6=\frac{512}{9}=27r^{6-1}$

$\displaystyle r^5=\frac{2^9}{3^5}$

$\displaystyle r=\frac{2^{\frac{9}{5}}}{3}=\frac{2\cdot2^{\frac{4}{5}}}{3}$

and so we have:

$\displaystyle a_n=27\left(\frac{2\cdot2^{\frac{4}{5}}}{3} \right)^{n-1}$

1.) Thus, we may now answer the first question:

$\displaystyle a_7=27\left(\frac{2\cdot2^{\frac{4}{5}}}{3} \right)^{6}=\frac{64\cdot2^{\frac{24}{5}}}{27}= \frac{1024 \cdot 2^{\frac{4}{5}}}{27}$

To find the sum of the first $n$ terms, consider:

$\displaystyle S_n=a_1+a_2+a_3+\cdots+a_n$

$\displaystyle S_n=a_1+a_1r+a_1r^2+\cdots+a_1r^{n-1}$

Multiply through by $r$:

$\displaystyle rS_n=a_1r+a_1r^2+a_1r^3+\cdots+a_1r^{n}=S_n+a_1r^{n}-a_1$

$\displaystyle rS_n-S_n=a_1r^{n}-a_1$

$\displaystyle (r-1)S_n=a_1r^{n}-a_1$

$\displaystyle S_n=\frac{a_1r^{n}-a_1}{r-1}=a_1\cdot\frac{r^n-1}{r-1}$

2.) Now we may answer the second question:

$\displaystyle S_5=a_1\cdot\frac{r^5-1}{r-1}=27\cdot\frac{\left(\frac{2\cdot2^{\frac{4}{5}}}{3} \right)^5-1}{\frac{2\cdot2^{\frac{4}{5}}}{3}-1}=\frac{269}{3(2\cdot2^{\frac{4}{5}}-3)}$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top