MHB Affine Algebraic Sets in A^2 - Dummit and Foote, page 660, Example 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Sets
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding a specific statement from Example (3) on page 660 of Dummit and Foote's text on algebraic geometry. The key point is that any polynomial f(x,y) in k[x,y] can be expressed in a form involving a polynomial g(x,y) and a remainder r(x,y) with a degree in y less than 2. This remainder can be further decomposed into two polynomials f_0(x) and f_1(x) in k[x]. The explanation relies on the Euclidean algorithm applied to polynomials in the context of affine algebraic sets. The inquiry emphasizes the need for a clear and careful breakdown of this reasoning.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
[I apologise for repeating this post ... but I genuinely would like help ... and the post comes from September 2015 ... and so is not an impatient "bump" of an item ... I hope administrators will understand ...]

=====================================================I am trying to gain an understanding of the basics of elementary algebraic geometry and am reading Dummit and Foote Chapter 15: Commutative Rings and Algebraic Geometry ...

At present I am focused on Section 15.1 Noetherian Rings and Affine Algebraic Sets ... ...

I need someone to help me to fully understand the reasoning/analysis behind one of the statements in Example (3) on Page 660 of D&F ...

On page 660 (in Section 15.1) of D&F we find the following text and examples (I am specifically focused on Example (3)):https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/5664
In the above text, in Example (3), we find the following:

"... ... For any polynomial $$f(x,y) \in k[x,y]$$ we can write

$$f(x,y) = f_0(x) + f_1(x)y + (x^3 - y^2) g(x,y).$$"Can someone explain ( :( slowly and carefully) exactly how/why this is true ... ...

Peter====================================================

In order for readers of the above post to understand the context of the question and the notation employed I am providing the introductory pages on affine algebraic sets in the D&F text ... ... as follows:View attachment 5665
View attachment 5666
View attachment 5667
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By definition $k[x,y] = (k[x])[y]$. So every polynomial in $k[x,y]$ is a polynomial in $y$ with coefficients in $k[x]$. The Euclidean algorithm over $k[x]$ yields $f(x,y) = (x^3 - y^2)g(x,y) + r(x,y)$ where $0 \le \operatorname{deg}_y(r(x,y)) < 2$ (note: $\operatorname{deg}_y p(x,y)$ denotes the degree of $p(x,y)$ as a polynomial in $y$). So $r(x,y) = f_0(x) + f_1(x)y$ for some $f_0(x), f_1(x)\in k[x]$.
 
Euge said:
By definition $k[x,y] = (k[x])[y]$. So every polynomial in $k[x,y]$ is a polynomial in $y$ with coefficients in $k[x]$. The Euclidean algorithm over $k[x]$ yields $f(x,y) = (x^3 - y^2)g(x,y) + r(x,y)$ where $0 \le \operatorname{deg}_y(r(x,y)) < 2$ (note: $\operatorname{deg}_y p(x,y)$ denotes the degree of $p(x,y)$ as a polynomial in $y$). So $r(x,y) = f_0(x) + f_1(x)y$ for some $f_0(x), f_1(x)\in k[x]$.

Thanks so much for the help Euge ... much appreciated ...

Sorry for the late reply ... i have been ill with the flu ... just recovering ...

Thanks again,

Peter
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K