Air Bearings: Porous block vs Colander for Air Feed

  • Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Air Block
In summary, the video discusses how air bearings made with porous materials like graphite have advantages over non-porous materials with an array of pin holes. These advantages include the ability to evenly distribute air pressure and reduce machining time and costs. Porous media bearings also have the added benefit of being able to tolerate surface contamination without impacting accuracy. This technology has been used in the coordinate measurement machine industry since the 1980s, providing better accuracy and cost savings.
  • #1
Swamp Thing
Insights Author
962
667
TL;DR Summary
What are the tradeoffs between air bearings built with porous materials, versus built with non-porous perforated parts
This video talks about how air bearings can be made using porous materials like graphite.
Is it possible to get a comparable performance using non-porous materials, with an array of pin holes?

The video talks about how the carbon seat can be easily worked into conforming with the matching part, but what if we are able to achieve the same tolerance by other means? In that case, would there still be any benefits from porous material in terms of the air pressure distribution and air dynamics etc --- apart from the process of shaping the part?
 
  • Informative
Likes 256bits
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have no experience with those bearings.
If I would have to make a decision about it, I would select the type that requires less machining time (perforating many pin holes at different angles may become costly and time consuming).
The effect of lifting the matching part and keeping certain gap may be equally achieved by the two methods, if enough pin holes uniformly distributed are made.
 
  • #3
  • Like
Likes Swamp Thing and Lnewqban
  • #4
Swamp Thing said:
Is it possible to get a comparable performance using non-porous materials, with an array of pin holes?
Yes it is.
The advantage of the porous material is that it bleeds air from the entire surface. It would be expensive and unnecessary to drill so many pinholes.

Drilling many deep pin holes in a solid material may be slow and difficult without breaking drills. You might use a laser, but the swarf or exhaust must exit through the same hole you are trying to feed the drill or laser light into. The drill must enter perpendicular to the surface, that may be difficult with a colander having two spherical surfaces.
 
  • Like
Likes Swamp Thing and Lnewqban
  • #5
I have been in the coordinate measurement machine (CMM) business since 1980. Back then the CMMs had precision mechanical bearings or air bearings. The accuracies were very competitive. This was before the geometric errors could be compensated for by “error Mapping”. The machines had to be accurate mechanically. About 1982 one cmm supplier started to use porous media air bearings in lieu of mechanical bearings. The engineers got the idea from the NASA Space Shuttle research using new manufacturing techniques.

There were many advantages with porous media bearings. As the video above shows, air seeps out of the media surface. Older design air bearings were simply around bearing pad with and orifice. But the air bearing required mucho Air PSI to “float” the CMM bridge on the granite plate and permit the Z axis quill to float. We are talking about 0.001 to 0.003” air gap. When you have this big an air requirement you need lots of compressed air.

Compressed air is one of the most overlooked expense in a machine shop operation. It is like electricity. It is always there and considered a necessary evil. When you have wide air gaps the compressor is running all the time the CMM is operating. When you have huge air gaps the air pressure tends to “chill” the guideway which will cause inaccuracy due to thermal gradients. You also have settling time required as you have “shoe lift” of the air bearing during acceleration and deceleration. All of these add up to non-ideal metrology and limit the accuracy desired. One more thing about porous media bearings is they can have the surface contaminated up 80% without impact on accuracy. Very forgiving. All these problems go way with porous media bearings. Less compressor run time means less expense, better accuracy, less maintenance.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes jim mcnamara, Swamp Thing, Lnewqban and 2 others
  • #6
Mike, lots of good info there. Thanks.
 
  • #7
Thank you.. one fixed cost no onethings about is cost of compressed air. we di calculation of electric cost of air compressor running back in the 1980s. If one of the young turks out there want to do a greennie thing,, recalculate the cost. Industry did introduce an air shut off for the Z axis counterbalance whe nnot in use for 30 seconds. This closed theair supply for the most offending air hog. The Z axis pneumatic counterbalance mechanism.
 

FAQ: Air Bearings: Porous block vs Colander for Air Feed

What are air bearings and how do they work?

Air bearings are a type of bearing that uses compressed air to create a thin layer of air between two surfaces, allowing for smooth and frictionless movement. They work by using the compressed air to lift and support the weight of the object, reducing the contact and friction between the surfaces.

What is the difference between a porous block and a colander for air feed in air bearings?

A porous block is a solid block of material with tiny holes or pores throughout, while a colander is a perforated bowl with larger holes. In air bearings, a porous block is used to evenly distribute the compressed air and create a uniform layer between the surfaces, while a colander may result in uneven air distribution and potential instability.

Which type of air feed is more efficient in air bearings?

A porous block is typically more efficient in air bearings because it allows for a more uniform distribution of air, resulting in smoother and more stable movement. A colander may lead to uneven air distribution and potential instability, making it less efficient.

Are there any disadvantages to using a porous block for air feed in air bearings?

One potential disadvantage of using a porous block for air feed in air bearings is the risk of clogging if the pores become blocked with debris or contaminants. This can affect the efficiency and performance of the air bearings and may require regular maintenance to prevent clogging.

What factors should be considered when choosing between a porous block and colander for air feed in air bearings?

When choosing between a porous block and colander for air feed in air bearings, factors such as the desired level of stability, efficiency, and potential for clogging should be considered. The specific application and operating conditions should also be taken into account to determine which type of air feed would be most suitable.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
13K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top