Air wedge interference pattern after being filled with water

In summary, the conversation discusses the effect of filling an air wedge with water on the interference pattern produced. The answer given in the book states that the fringe spacing will increase, but the reasoning presented leads to the conclusion that it will actually decrease. This is due to the higher refractive index of water, which reduces the distance needed for the optical path length to increase by a wavelength. It is possible that the book is incorrect in this matter.
  • #1
Andrew Tom
14
0
Homework Statement
Air wedge interference pattern after being filled with water
Relevant Equations
##x=\frac{\lambda}{2\tan \theta}##
An air wedge is illuminated with light and an interference pattern is produced. What will happen to the interference pattern when the air wedge is filled with water?

The answer given at the back of the book is that the fringe spacing of the interference pattern will increase, however my reasoning is leading me to the conclusion that it will decrease.

The derivation for fringe spacing given in the book for an air wedge shows that it is ##\frac{\lambda}{2\tan \theta}## where ##\theta## is the wedge angle. When I re-derived the formula using the same reasoning but for water with refractive index n I got the fringe spacing ##\frac{\lambda}{2n\tan\theta}##. So the fringe spacing will decrease because n>1 for water.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Andrew Tom said:
the interference pattern will increase
Are those the exact words? I don't know what that means.
 
  • #3
haruspex said:
Are those the exact words? I don't know what that means.
Sorry it says the fringe spacing will increase.
 
  • #4
Andrew Tom said:
Sorry it says the fringe spacing will increase.
I agree with you. A higher refractive index would mean you don't need to go so far along the wedge for the optical path length to increase by a wavelength.
 
  • #5
haruspex said:
I agree with you. A higher refractive index would mean you don't need to go so far along the wedge for the optical path length to increase by a wavelength.
So is the book wrong?
 
  • #6
Andrew Tom said:
So is the book wrong?
I would say so. Others may chip in.
 
Back
Top