- #1
mrajkumar
- 11
- 0
What is the correct way to put limitation on different aircraft flying conditions with respect to the cavitation point of view of the Fuel booster pump in the aircraft? The pump is immersed in the fuel and the fuel tank is vented to atmosphere(in atmospheric pressure, which will change with altitude)
From my understanding, as the flow rate increases the minimum pressure required at the suction side of the pump to avoid cavitation will increase. So, To specify the limitation like, "the maximum possible flow rate for a particular altitude will be fixed" is it correct?. Here I've taken only the atmospheric pressure exerted on the fuel surface, irrespective of the fuel column available above the inlet of the pump (since the fuel column level will vary according the consumption rate), or do we have to specify the limitation in terms of, "for particular fuel column available, the maximum flow rate possible will be fixed(taking the pressure because of fuel head also)".
Out of two approach which is the correct way to put limitation on flying conditions!
*(the fuel column measured is by gauging probe which is not exact always )
From my understanding, as the flow rate increases the minimum pressure required at the suction side of the pump to avoid cavitation will increase. So, To specify the limitation like, "the maximum possible flow rate for a particular altitude will be fixed" is it correct?. Here I've taken only the atmospheric pressure exerted on the fuel surface, irrespective of the fuel column available above the inlet of the pump (since the fuel column level will vary according the consumption rate), or do we have to specify the limitation in terms of, "for particular fuel column available, the maximum flow rate possible will be fixed(taking the pressure because of fuel head also)".
Out of two approach which is the correct way to put limitation on flying conditions!
*(the fuel column measured is by gauging probe which is not exact always )