MHB Airshow4444's question at Yahoo Answers regarding volumes by slicing

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volumes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a solid with an elliptical base defined by the equation 25x² + 36y² = 900, using calculus. The lower and upper limits of integration are determined to be -6 and 6, respectively. The base and height of the isosceles right triangular cross-section are expressed as functions of x, leading to the area formula A(x) = (25/36)(36 - x²). The volume is then calculated using the integral V = (25/36)∫ from -6 to 6 of (36 - x²) dx, resulting in a final volume of 200. This approach effectively demonstrates the application of calculus in finding volumes of solids with complex shapes.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Volume of a Solid using Calculus?


I am quite confused as to how to approach this. I know the volume will be the area between the curves but I haven't seen a problem like this before... Any help?

The base of a certain solid is an elliptical region with boundary curve 25x2+36y2=900. Cross-sections perpendicular to the x-axis are isosceles right triangles with hypotenuse in the base.

Use the formula V=∫baA(x)dx to find the volume of the solid.

The lower limit of integration is a =
The upper limit of integration is b =
The base of the triangular cross-section is the following function of x:
The height of the triangular cross-section is the following function of x:
The area of the triangular cross-section is A(x)=
Thus the volume of the solid is V=

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Airshow4444,

I would first rewrite the given elliptical base in standard form so we may determine the length of the horizontal axis:

$$25x^2+36y^2=900$$

Divide through by $900$:

$$\frac{x^2}{6^2}+\frac{y^2}{5^2}=1$$

Hence, we see the lower limit of integration is $a=-6$ and $b=6$.

The base $B$ of the triangular cross-section for a given $x$ is:

$$B(x)=2y(x)=2\frac{5}{6}\sqrt{6^2-x^2}=\frac{5}{3}\sqrt{6^2-x^2}$$

The height $h$ of the triangular cross-section for a given $x$ is:

$$h(x)=y(x)=\frac{5}{6}\sqrt{6^2-x^2}$$

The area $A$ of the triangular cross-section for a given $x$ is:

$$A(x)=\frac{1}{2}B(x)h(x)=\frac{25}{36}\left(6^2-x^2 \right)$$

Hence, the volume of the solid is given by:

$$V=\frac{25}{36}\int_{-6}^{6}6^2-x^2\,dx=\frac{25}{16}\int_{0}^{6}6^2-x^2\,dx$$

Note: the integrand is an even function, therefore we may apply the even function rule.

Applying the FTOC, we find:

$$V=\frac{25}{18}\left[6^2x-\frac{1}{3}x^3 \right]_0^6=\frac{25}{18}\cdot6^3\left(1-\frac{1}{3} \right)=200$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top