MHB Alexander's question via email about Newton's Method

AI Thread Summary
Alexander inquires about applying Newton's Method to solve the equation e^(1.2x) = 1.5 + 2.5cos²(x) starting with an initial estimate of x₀ = 1. The equation is reformulated to f(x) = e^(1.2x) - 1.5 - 2.5cos²(x) = 0. The derivative is calculated as f'(x) = 1.2e^(1.2x) + 5sin(x)cos(x). After three iterations using Newton's Method, the approximate root found is x₃ = 0.81797.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Alexander asks:

Apply three iterations of Newton's Method to find an approximate solution of the equation

$\displaystyle \mathrm{e}^{1.2\,x} = 1.5 + 2.5\cos^2{\left( x \right) } $

if your initial estimate is $\displaystyle x_0 = 1 $.

What solution do you get?
 

Attachments

  • nm1.jpg
    nm1.jpg
    30.8 KB · Views: 159
  • nm2.jpg
    nm2.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 169
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
@Prove It answers:

Newton's Method solves an equation of the form $\displaystyle f\left( x \right) = 0 $, so we need to rewrite the equation as

$\displaystyle \mathrm{e}^{1.2\,x} - 1.5 - 2.5\cos^2{\left( x \right) } = 0 $

Thus $\displaystyle f\left( x \right) = \mathrm{e}^{1.2\,x} - 1.5 - 2.5\cos^2{\left( x \right) }$.

Newton's Method is: $\displaystyle x_{n+1} = x_n - \frac{f\left( x_n \right) }{f'\left( x_n \right) } $

We will need the derivative, $\displaystyle f'\left( x \right) = 1.2\,\mathrm{e}^{1.2\,x} + 5\sin{\left( x \right) }\cos{\left( x \right) } $.I have used my CAS to do this problem:

View attachment 9644

View attachment 9645

So after three iterations the root is approximately $\displaystyle x_3 = 0.81797 $.
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top