MHB Algebraic Extensions - Dummit and Foote, Propositions 11 and 12 .... ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Propositions 11 and 12 in Dummit and Foote's Chapter 13 on Algebraic Extensions discuss the relationship between the degree of field extensions and minimum polynomials. Proposition 11 states that the degree of the extension F(α) over F equals the degree of the minimum polynomial of α. In contrast, Proposition 12 indicates that an element α in an extension of degree n satisfies a polynomial of degree at most n, which can lead to confusion regarding the consistency of these statements. The clarification provided highlights that Proposition 12 refers to any arbitrary extension of degree n, not specifically F(α). This distinction resolves the apparent contradiction between the propositions.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Chapter 13 - Field Theory.

I am currently studying Section 13.2 : Algebraic Extensions

I need some help with an aspect of Propositions 11 and 12 ... ...

Propositions 11 and 12 read as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6606https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/6607
Now Proposition 11 states that the degree of $$F( \alpha )$$ over $$F$$ is equal to the degree of the minimum polynomial ... ... that is

$$[ F( \alpha ) \ : \ F ] = \text{ deg } m_\alpha (x) = \text{ deg } \alpha
$$

... ... BUT ... ...... ... Proposition 12 states that ... "if $$\alpha$$ is an element of an extension of degree $$n$$ over $$F$$, then $$\alpha$$ satisfies a polynomial of degree at most $$n$$ over $$F$$ ... ... "Doesn't Proposition 11 guarantee that the polynomial (the minimum polynomial) is actually of degree equal to $$n$$?Can someone please explain in simple terms how these statements are consistent?Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It appears you overlooked something simple. The second sentence of Proposition 12 considers an arbitrary extension of degree $n$, not $F(\alpha)$. For a concrete example, the number $\sqrt{3}$ is algebraic over $\Bbb Q$ of degree $2$, and it belongs to the extension $Q(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$, of degree $4$ over $\Bbb Q$.
 
Euge said:
It appears you overlooked something simple. The second sentence of Proposition 12 considers an arbitrary extension of degree $n$, not $F(\alpha)$. For a concrete example, the number $\sqrt{3}$ is algebraic over $\Bbb Q$ of degree $2$, and it belongs to the extension $Q(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$, of degree $4$ over $\Bbb Q$.
Thanks Euge ... appreciate your help ...

... now reading text again carefully ...

Peter
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K