- #1
raxAdaam
- 32
- 0
Hi there,
I was hammering out the coefficients for the Taylor Series expansion of [itex]f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}[/itex], which proved to be quite unsatisfying, so decide to have a look around online for alt. approaches.
What I found (in addition to the method that uses the binomial theorem) was an old post here claiming that a trig sub could be used (here, post #5). However, the sub. - at least as written there, definitely doesn't line up:
[itex]x = sin(u)[/itex], which yields [itex]f(x) = sec(u)[/itex]. However the post seems to mix up the differentials, claiming: [itex]\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{df}{du}\cdot\frac{dx}{du}[/itex], which is - unless I'm entirely missing something - not correct, right? We should actually have:
[itex]\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{df}{du}\cdot\frac{du}{dx} = sec(u)tan(u)\cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}} = sec(u)tan(u)\cdot\frac{1}{cos(u)}[/itex] ...
I'm hoping that I've missed something here, because the method would be stellar and super insightful if it was valid, but it seems the differentials are not handled properly - can anyone confirm this?
Cheers,
Rax
I was hammering out the coefficients for the Taylor Series expansion of [itex]f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}[/itex], which proved to be quite unsatisfying, so decide to have a look around online for alt. approaches.
What I found (in addition to the method that uses the binomial theorem) was an old post here claiming that a trig sub could be used (here, post #5). However, the sub. - at least as written there, definitely doesn't line up:
[itex]x = sin(u)[/itex], which yields [itex]f(x) = sec(u)[/itex]. However the post seems to mix up the differentials, claiming: [itex]\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{df}{du}\cdot\frac{dx}{du}[/itex], which is - unless I'm entirely missing something - not correct, right? We should actually have:
[itex]\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{df}{du}\cdot\frac{du}{dx} = sec(u)tan(u)\cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}} = sec(u)tan(u)\cdot\frac{1}{cos(u)}[/itex] ...
I'm hoping that I've missed something here, because the method would be stellar and super insightful if it was valid, but it seems the differentials are not handled properly - can anyone confirm this?
Cheers,
Rax