I Alternate expressions for the uncertainty propagation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on two formulas for calculating uncertainty propagation in measurements: one using absolute uncertainties and the other using standard deviations. The first formula provides a linear approximation, while the second incorporates the variances of the measurements, reflecting their correlation. An example using Ohm's law illustrates how both methods yield slightly different results for resistor values, emphasizing the importance of choosing the appropriate formula based on the context. The choice between the two methods should consider the level of accuracy required and the correlation between the variables involved. Understanding these differences is crucial for effective error propagation analysis.
AndersF
Messages
27
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
What criteria to use to decide which of the two formulas to use.
I have seen that there are two different formulas that we can use when calculating the propagation of uncertainty in a measurement. If ##X=f(A, B, C, \ldots)## is the quantity whose uncertainty we want to estimate, which depends on the quantities ##A,B,C,...##, then we could calculate the propagation of uncertainty either by (1) or by (2):

$$\Delta X=\left|\frac{\partial f}{\partial A}\right| \cdot \Delta A+\left|\frac{\partial f}{\partial B}\right| \cdot \Delta B+\left|\frac{\partial f}{\partial C}\right| \cdot \Delta C+\cdots \tag{1}$$

$$\sigma_{X}=\sqrt{ \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial A} \right)^{2}\sigma_{A}^2+\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial B} \right)^{2}\sigma_{B}^2+\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial C} \right)^{2}\sigma_{C}^2+\cdots } \tag{2}$$

With ##\Delta X, \Delta A,\Delta B,\Delta C,...## the uncertainties in the values of ##X, A,B,C,...## and ##\sigma_X,\sigma_A,\sigma_B,\sigma_C,...## the standard deviation in these measurements.

What is the difference between these two expressions? When do we choose equation (1) or equation (2) for estimating the propagation of uncertainty in a value?

____________________________________________________________________________​

For example, if we wanted to estimate the uncertainty in the calculation of the value of some resistors from the measured values in current and voltage, ##V = 2.04,\space 2.10,\space 2.19 \space V##, ##I =16.8,\space 28.7 ,\space 63.7\space mA##, whit ##\Delta V = 0.01\space V## and ##\Delta I =0.1\space mA## the uncertainties in these measurements, applying (1) and (2) to Ohm's law would give (3) and (4), next to next:

$$\Delta R=\left|\frac{1}{I}\Delta V\right|+\left|\frac{V}{I^{2}} \Delta I\right| \tag{4}$$
$$\sigma_{R}=\sqrt{ \frac{1}{I^2}\sigma_{I}^2 + \frac{V^2}{I^{4}}\sigma_{B}^2} \tag{2}$$

Then, for the ##R=121.42857..., \space 73.17073..., \space 34.37990... \space \Omega## calculated values, if we take ##\sigma_V= \Delta V## and ##\sigma_I= \Delta I##, we would get these values, which in this case are slightly different:

$$\Delta R=1,\space 0.6,\space 0.2\space \Omega$$
$$\sigma_{R} = 0.9,\space 0.4,\space 0.2\space \Omega$$

Therefore, what would be the criteria for deciding whether to use (1) and (2), for this example and for a general case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Picking out formulas willy-nilly is going to cause you trouble. If you need more than an estimate- and either will do that - you need to understand error propegation at the level of, say, Taylor's book. The difference between those two expressions is the degree of correlkation.
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top