- #1
Sibbo
- 3
- 1
- TL;DR Summary
- An alternator rotates at constant frequency. It is connected to a phase-shifted AC power source at the same frequency. What is the torque experienced by the alternator depending on angle?
Hi,
I am trying to figure out the torque experienced by an alternator to plug into the swing equation.
I am not sure how to exactly model the alternator for that. With my current approach, I only get confused.
My idea is to model the alternator as a AC power source with fixed frequency in serial with a resistor. If I then short-circuit the alternator, the torque experienced is directly proportional to the produced power, right?
So say the frequency f=1Hz, the peak voltage is Umax=1V and the resistor is R=1Ohm.
Then, the voltage of the AC power source over time is Us(t)=Umax*sin(2pi*f*t)=sin(2pi*t) volt.
And the current over time is I(t)=Us(t)/R=sin(2pi*t) ampere.
Therefore the power over time is P(t)=Us(t)*I(t)=sin(2pi*t)*sin(2pi*t).
So far this is correct, or is it? The power is always positive (or always negative, depending on sign).
Now, I am confused what happens if I connect it to another alternator instead of short circuiting. Say an alternator with the same properties, but a phase shifted by angle phi.
What I would expect to happen is that the torques experienced by both alternators, integrated over one full revolution, would be in the direction that reduces phi towards zero, if phi is small to begin with. Say phi is in the interval [-pi/2, pi/2] at the start, then the torques would cause phi to reduce, if the alternators were not fixed to a given frequency.
However, in my model above, if I would connect two alternators in parallel, I get confused.
The alternators are modelled as AC power sources with a resistor in series again. The resistor is connected to the phase of the alternator. By connecting them in parallel, I mean connecting their grounds together and connecting the resistors together, such that we get a loop. I can draw a picture if required, but right now I have no paper.
Now we can again take the voltages over time which are:
U1(t)=Vmax*sin(2pi*f*t)
U2(t)=Vmax*sin(2pi*f*t+phi)
The voltage between the AC power sources would be
U(t)=Vmax*sin(2pi*f*t)-Vmax*sin(2pi*f*t+phi)
And the current
I(t)=U(t)/2R
And power
P(t)=U(t)I(t)
According to Wolfram alpha, when integrating this over one revolution, I get
P(phi)=-2pi(cos(phi) - 1)
This does not seem to make sense, as independently of the sign of phi, the sign of the power is always the same. I would think that depending on the sign of the phase difference, the power would be positive or negative, such that the phase difference would reduce. However, like this it seems like one alternator would always be accelerated (or always decelerated), independent of the sign of phi.
This does not make sense, as Wikipedia says, that running an alternator in a power network with a slightly leading phase will cause it to produce more current and hence more power, which should create forces that slow it down.
I hope this is not too complex, but can anyone point out where I went wrong?
I am trying to figure out the torque experienced by an alternator to plug into the swing equation.
I am not sure how to exactly model the alternator for that. With my current approach, I only get confused.
My idea is to model the alternator as a AC power source with fixed frequency in serial with a resistor. If I then short-circuit the alternator, the torque experienced is directly proportional to the produced power, right?
So say the frequency f=1Hz, the peak voltage is Umax=1V and the resistor is R=1Ohm.
Then, the voltage of the AC power source over time is Us(t)=Umax*sin(2pi*f*t)=sin(2pi*t) volt.
And the current over time is I(t)=Us(t)/R=sin(2pi*t) ampere.
Therefore the power over time is P(t)=Us(t)*I(t)=sin(2pi*t)*sin(2pi*t).
So far this is correct, or is it? The power is always positive (or always negative, depending on sign).
Now, I am confused what happens if I connect it to another alternator instead of short circuiting. Say an alternator with the same properties, but a phase shifted by angle phi.
What I would expect to happen is that the torques experienced by both alternators, integrated over one full revolution, would be in the direction that reduces phi towards zero, if phi is small to begin with. Say phi is in the interval [-pi/2, pi/2] at the start, then the torques would cause phi to reduce, if the alternators were not fixed to a given frequency.
However, in my model above, if I would connect two alternators in parallel, I get confused.
The alternators are modelled as AC power sources with a resistor in series again. The resistor is connected to the phase of the alternator. By connecting them in parallel, I mean connecting their grounds together and connecting the resistors together, such that we get a loop. I can draw a picture if required, but right now I have no paper.
Now we can again take the voltages over time which are:
U1(t)=Vmax*sin(2pi*f*t)
U2(t)=Vmax*sin(2pi*f*t+phi)
The voltage between the AC power sources would be
U(t)=Vmax*sin(2pi*f*t)-Vmax*sin(2pi*f*t+phi)
And the current
I(t)=U(t)/2R
And power
P(t)=U(t)I(t)
According to Wolfram alpha, when integrating this over one revolution, I get
P(phi)=-2pi(cos(phi) - 1)
Compute 'integrate (sin(x-phi)-sin(x))^2 over x from 0 to 2pi' with the Wolfram|Alpha website (https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integrate+(sin(x-phi)-sin(x))^2+over+x+from+0+to+2pi) or mobile app (wolframalpha:///?i=integrate+%28sin%28x-phi%29-sin%28x%29%29%5E2+over+x+from+0+to+2pi)
This does not seem to make sense, as independently of the sign of phi, the sign of the power is always the same. I would think that depending on the sign of the phase difference, the power would be positive or negative, such that the phase difference would reduce. However, like this it seems like one alternator would always be accelerated (or always decelerated), independent of the sign of phi.
This does not make sense, as Wikipedia says, that running an alternator in a power network with a slightly leading phase will cause it to produce more current and hence more power, which should create forces that slow it down.
I hope this is not too complex, but can anyone point out where I went wrong?