- #1
Thomas Sturm
- 9
- 3
- TL;DR Summary
- What is the typical mass of the plasma (in typical working configuration) in current nuclear fusion reactor designs?
Hi everyone,
I am trying to figure out the following question:
What is the typical mass of the plasma (in typical working configuration) in current nuclear fusion reactor designs?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER: "...plasma volume of 840 cubic meters..."
So all I need is the plasma density. Enter the "Lawson criterion" and the "triple product"...all very interesting reads, but I couldn't find any values for, let's say: Wendelstein, ITER and a "commercially viable fusion reactor".
Reason why I'm asking: I strongly suspect the actual "working mass" of plasma in a fusion reactor to be really low as compared to, say, the amount of Uranium in a fission reactor. 840 m^3 filled with air would amount to 1071 kg. This is the amount of air roughly rushing into the core of a fusion reactor (ITER type) if push comes to shove and the core containment breaks. Very, very cold air, and lots of it, seems to be the perfect "emergency off" button build into the very design of fusion reactors - as opposed to fission reactors, two of which (in Tchernobyl and Fukushima) are currently on their (slow, but steady) way towards the center of the planet.
If m(plasma) << m(air), a "Super-Accident" in a fusion plant would be a fly's burp as compared to the same mishap in a fission reactor. Or am I completely wrong somewhere?
I am trying to figure out the following question:
What is the typical mass of the plasma (in typical working configuration) in current nuclear fusion reactor designs?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER: "...plasma volume of 840 cubic meters..."
So all I need is the plasma density. Enter the "Lawson criterion" and the "triple product"...all very interesting reads, but I couldn't find any values for, let's say: Wendelstein, ITER and a "commercially viable fusion reactor".
Reason why I'm asking: I strongly suspect the actual "working mass" of plasma in a fusion reactor to be really low as compared to, say, the amount of Uranium in a fission reactor. 840 m^3 filled with air would amount to 1071 kg. This is the amount of air roughly rushing into the core of a fusion reactor (ITER type) if push comes to shove and the core containment breaks. Very, very cold air, and lots of it, seems to be the perfect "emergency off" button build into the very design of fusion reactors - as opposed to fission reactors, two of which (in Tchernobyl and Fukushima) are currently on their (slow, but steady) way towards the center of the planet.
If m(plasma) << m(air), a "Super-Accident" in a fusion plant would be a fly's burp as compared to the same mishap in a fission reactor. Or am I completely wrong somewhere?
Last edited: