Ampere's Law -- What is the meaning behind each part?

  • Thread starter Thread starter np115
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ampere's law Law
Click For Summary
Ampere's Law relates the magnetic field around a current-carrying wire to the current itself, expressed as S B · dl = μ₀I. The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic field at a point outside a wire, with the question of whether to use B(2πa) or B(2πb). It is clarified that a single current-carrying wire does not create a uniform magnetic field, but symmetry allows for simplifications in calculations. The correct approach involves using a circular path of radius R around the wire to derive B(R) using Ampere's circuital law. Understanding these concepts is crucial for applying Ampere's Law correctly in various scenarios.
np115
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
So I know that SB · dl = u0I (sorry this is the only way that was working). But I was wondering what each part meant? Cause in Gauss's law, the SE · dA is the object that is being used to calculate electric field and in Ampere's, it is meant to be similar. So if we had a wire of radius a. This wire creates a uniform field. If we had to calculate the field at point b outside the wire, what would the equation look like? From what I have learned, we would use a circle for this. So B(2pi a) or B(2pi b)?
Relevant Equations
S B · dl = u0I
I believe it would be B(2pi b) but I'm not sure how exactly to explain why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
np115 said:
Homework Statement:: So I know that SB · dl = u0I (sorry this is the only way that was working). But I was wondering what each part meant? Cause in Gauss's law, the SE · dA is the object that is being used to calculate electric field and in Ampere's, it is meant to be similar. So if we had a wire of radius a. This wire creates a uniform field. If we had to calculate the field at point b outside the wire, what would the equation look like? From what I have learned, we would use a circle for this. So B(2pi a) or B(2pi b)?
Relevant Equations:: S B · dl = u0I

I believe it would be B(2pi b) but I'm not sure how exactly to explain why.
You need to read Ampere's law carefully.
 
np115 said:
This wire creates a uniform field. If we had to calculate the field at point b outside the wire, what would the equation look like?
No wire creates a uniform magnetic field.
If you wanted to calculate the electric field due to a charged sphere of radius ##a## at point ##b## outside the sphere, would you use ##E (4 \pi a^2)## or ##E (4 \pi b^2)## on the left hand side of the equation for Gauss's law? Why?

I agree with @rude man: study Ampere's law some more and pay attention to how it is used in your textbook's examples.
 
Of course a single current-conducting wire doesn't create a uniform magnetic field, but you can use symmetry for the simple case of an infinitely long wire. You know by symmetry that the magnetic field is always of the form ##\vec{B}(\vec{r})=B(R) \vec{e}_{\varphi}##, where I've put the wire along the ##z##-axis of a cylinder-coordinate system ##(R,\varphi,z)##.

To get ##B(R)## just use Ampere's circuital law with a circle of radius ##R## around the ##z##-axis in a plane perpendicular to the ##z##-axis.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K