- #1
Clockclocle
- 29
- 1
- TL;DR Summary
- I this a true way of understanding of instantaneous velocity??
After a year of thinking about instantaneous velocity. I think that this notion is no more than a mathematic coincidence when mathematician tried to find the tangent of curve. The only definition of velocity that make sense is ##\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t}##, this proportion is a quantity that show how much the object move after a certain of time.
If we let the object to have a velocity at each instant, let say a man is moving at 500m/s 10 second after we press the clock, that mean that if he do not push the pedal after this instant he will move 5000 m after 10 seconds. However, he might push the pedal since there are many other cars, so the velocity at each time will no the same because if we look at him from the road he will be slowdown.
The first case is easy to find the whole road he ride after 10 second by multiply 500m/s with 10s we get 5000m, the latter case is more complicated, but when we graph the function of each 2 scenarios, the problem of finding the whole distance will the as same as calculate the area under the graph then we use the integral from mathematical analysis. I think that the notion of average velocity is misleading, the way it represent look like it depend on the function of distance, while it is just a quantity to show how much the distance change after a certain time. Finally, we should not teaching average velocity, there is only one true velocity that is instantaneous velocity which make sense
If we let the object to have a velocity at each instant, let say a man is moving at 500m/s 10 second after we press the clock, that mean that if he do not push the pedal after this instant he will move 5000 m after 10 seconds. However, he might push the pedal since there are many other cars, so the velocity at each time will no the same because if we look at him from the road he will be slowdown.
The first case is easy to find the whole road he ride after 10 second by multiply 500m/s with 10s we get 5000m, the latter case is more complicated, but when we graph the function of each 2 scenarios, the problem of finding the whole distance will the as same as calculate the area under the graph then we use the integral from mathematical analysis. I think that the notion of average velocity is misleading, the way it represent look like it depend on the function of distance, while it is just a quantity to show how much the distance change after a certain time. Finally, we should not teaching average velocity, there is only one true velocity that is instantaneous velocity which make sense