- #1
jdinatale
- 155
- 0
I could probably find the answer to this problem easily by a quick google search, but I don't want to spoil it. Instead, could someone give me a hint in the right direction?
Ok, so it seems to me like a contradiction would work here. It seems like directly proving the existence of an irrational between two arbitrary real numbers would be impossible.
Assuming that EVERY number between two arbitrary numbers is rational seems like a good ground for a contradiction. Now I thought of two things from here,
Consider that [itex]a < (a + b)/2 < b[/itex] and show [itex](a + b)/2[/itex] is irrational. But that won't work because a and b could be rational.
Next, I thought to consider the geometric mean [itex]a < \sqrt{ab} < b[/itex] and show that [itex]\sqrt{ab}[/itex] is irrational. But this is a problem because if one of a or b is negative, the geometric mean does not exist.
Now I only have access to bare bones tools like the fact that the real numbers is a field, the axiom of completeness, and the Archimedean Principle.
The Archimedean Principle appears useful, but I'm not sure how to cook up an irrational number using it.
Ok, so it seems to me like a contradiction would work here. It seems like directly proving the existence of an irrational between two arbitrary real numbers would be impossible.
Assuming that EVERY number between two arbitrary numbers is rational seems like a good ground for a contradiction. Now I thought of two things from here,
Consider that [itex]a < (a + b)/2 < b[/itex] and show [itex](a + b)/2[/itex] is irrational. But that won't work because a and b could be rational.
Next, I thought to consider the geometric mean [itex]a < \sqrt{ab} < b[/itex] and show that [itex]\sqrt{ab}[/itex] is irrational. But this is a problem because if one of a or b is negative, the geometric mean does not exist.
Now I only have access to bare bones tools like the fact that the real numbers is a field, the axiom of completeness, and the Archimedean Principle.
The Archimedean Principle appears useful, but I'm not sure how to cook up an irrational number using it.