Analyse motion of an oscillator: x(t)=0.2cos(12*pi*t)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the motion of an oscillator defined by the equation x(t)=0.2cos(12πt). The period of the oscillator is determined to be T=1/6 seconds, and the times when the oscillator is at x=0 are calculated. Participants confirm that the speed of the oscillator increases for a duration of 7/24 seconds within the specified time interval of (1/12, 2/3) seconds. Alternative methods for determining when the speed is increasing are suggested, including examining the signs of velocity and acceleration. Overall, the calculations and methods presented are validated by other participants in the discussion.
MatinSAR
Messages
673
Reaction score
204
Homework Statement
The equation of motion of an oscillator in SI is ##x(t)=0.2cos(12\pi t)##. In the time interval ## (\frac {1}{18}s,\frac {2}{3}s)##, How many seconds is the speed increasing?
Relevant Equations
Kinematics.
Hello.
I have tried to solve it using x-t Graph. We know that period of this function is ##T=\frac {1}{6}s##.
Then I've used ##x(t)=0## to find the times in which the oscillator is at ##x=0##:
##t=\frac {k}{12} + \frac {1}{24}## for ## k \in Z.##
Now I can draw x-t graph.
1685139958724.png

We should check time interval ## (\frac {1}{18}s,\frac {2}{3}s)##:
##x(\frac {1}{18}s)=-0.1m## (Point A in below graph.)
##x(\frac {2}{3}s)=0.2m## (Point B in below graph.)
1685140639162.png

Blue lines show motion with increasing speed.
So time of motion with increasing speed is: ##(7)(\frac {3}{24}s-\frac {2}{24}s)= \frac {7}{24}s.##

Is it correct?
Can someone suggest another easy way please?
 

Attachments

  • 1685140351510.png
    1685140351510.png
    14.6 KB · Views: 123
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the time interval from ##t=1/12##s to time ##t=2/3##s. During one half of this interval, the object's speed is increasing and during one half of the interval, it's decreasing.
 
@sammy Thank you for your help.

Another way that came to my mind:
In a complete period, the speed is increasing in ##T/2## seconds.
First period is incomplete(I mean we should check time interval ##(1/12,2/3s)##) but we can find that in this period the speed is increasing in ##T/4## seconds.
Here we have 3 complete periods plus one incomplete period. We put ##T=1/6s## then we have:
##(3)(T/2)+T/4=7T/4=7/24s##
 
MatinSAR said:
Is it correct?
Can someone suggest another easy way please?
Your result looks correct to me and your method looks good.

Another approach is to note that the speed is increasing whenever the velocity and acceleration have the same sign. This is equivalent to saying that the product of the velocity and acceleration is positive.

You can easily show that the product of velocity and acceleration is equal to a positive constant times ##\sin(24 \pi t)##. So, the speed is increasing whenever ##\sin(24 \pi t)## is positive. But, you still have to think about the beginning and ending times: 1/18 s and 2/3 s.

I don't think this approach is really any better. It's just a different way to think about it.
 
TSny said:
Another approach is to note that the speed is increasing whenever the velocity and acceleration have the same sign. This is equivalent to saying that the product of the velocity and acceleration is positive.

You can easily show that the product of velocity and acceleration is equal to a positive constant times ##\sin(24 \pi t)##. So, the speed is increasing whenever ##\sin(24 \pi t)## is positive. But, you still have to think about the beginning and ending times: 1/18 s and 2/3 s.
Taking that a bit further, the product is positive for half the time in any interval of 1/12s, so it is a matter of figuring out the time for which it is positive in (0, 1/18), then subtracting that from half of 8/12.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny and MatinSAR
TSny said:
Your result looks correct to me and your method looks good.
@TSny Thank you for your time.
TSny said:
I don't think this approach is really any better. It's just a different way to think about it.
Thank you for sharing this.

@haruspex Thank you for your help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top