Angular momentum of a particles in the form of ##L = mr^2\omega##

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the angular momentum formula for a planet orbiting the sun, specifically showing that ##L = mr^2\omega##. Participants clarify that the angle ##\phi## has different meanings in various contexts, leading to confusion in calculations. The angle in the equation ##L = mvr \sin \phi## represents the angle between the momentum vector and the position vector, while in the context of angular velocity, it refers to the angle in polar coordinates. It is emphasized that for circular motion, this angle is consistently 90 degrees, simplifying the relationship to ##L = mvr##. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to use a different variable, ##\psi##, to avoid further confusion.
Redwaves
Messages
134
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
Consider a planet orbiting the fixed sun. Take the plane of the planet's orbit to be the xy plane, with the sun at the origin and label the planet's position by polar coordinates (##r,\phi##). Show that the planet's angular momentum has magnitude ##L = mr^2\omega##, where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##
Relevant Equations
##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times \vec{r}##
##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times\vec{r}##

##L = mvr sin \phi##, where P = mv

Since ##\vec{r}## and ##\vec{v}## are always perpendicular, ##\phi## = 90.

Then, ##L = mvr##

At this point, I don't see how to get ##L = mvr = mr^2\omega##, using ##\omega = \dot{\phi}##

I know that ##\omega = \frac{v}{r}##. However, the way the question if written, I'm wondering if there's another by way using the angle ##\phi##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Redwaves said:
Homework Statement:: Consider a planet orbiting the fixed sun. Take the plane of the planet's orbit to be the xy plane, with the sun at the origin and label the planet's position by polar coordinates (##r,\phi##). Show that the planet's angular momentum has magnitude ##L = mr^2\omega##, where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##
Relevant Equations:: ##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times \vec{r}##

##\vec{L} = \vec{P} \times\vec{r}##

##L = mvr sin \phi##, where P = mv

Since ##\vec{r}## and ##\vec{v}## are always perpendicular, ##\phi## = 90.

Then, ##L = mvr##

At this point, I don't see how to get ##L = mvr = mr^2\omega##, using ##\omega = \dot{\phi}##

I know that ##\omega = \frac{v}{r}##. However, the way the question if written, I'm wondering if there's another by way using the angle ##\phi##.
You are confusing two uses of the variable name ##\phi##.
In "where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##", ##\phi## is the angle in the XY plane as a polar coordinate.
In ##L = mvr sin \phi##, it is the angle between the vector ##\vec{P}## and the vector ##\vec r##.
 
haruspex said:
You are confusing two uses of the variable name ##\phi##.
In "where ##\dot\phi## = ##\omega##", ##\phi## is the angle in the XY plane as a polar coordinate.
In ##L = mvr sin \phi##, it is the angle between the vector ##\vec{P}## and the vector ##\vec r##.
Isn't ##\dot{\phi} = \frac{d\phi}{dt}##, which is ##\frac{\Delta\phi}{\Delta t}## where t -> 0

Thus, we are using ##\phi## the angle.
 
Redwaves said:
Isn't ##\dot{\phi} = \frac{d\phi}{dt}##, which is ##\frac{\Delta\phi}{\Delta t}## where t -> 0
Yes, but the ##{\phi} ## in ##\omega=\dot\phi## is the angle around the sun in the XY plane. I.e. if we write the coordinates in polar, the position of the planet at time t is ##\vec {r(t)}=(r(t),\phi(t))##. Clearly this angle is not always 90°.

In the equation ##L = mvr sin \phi##, ##{\phi} ## has a completely different meaning. It is the angle between the vector ##\vec v= \dot {\vec r }(t)## and the vector ##\vec r##. For circular motion, this angle is always 90°.

To avoid confusion, write ##L = mvr \sin (\psi)## instead.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top