MHB Angular speed of 2 pulleys on a belt

AI Thread Summary
The larger pulley with a radius of 15 cm rotates 24 times in 36 seconds, resulting in an angular velocity of 2/3 rotations per second. The smaller pulley, with a radius of 8 cm, has an angular velocity calculated to be (8/5)π radians per second. The linear velocity of the belt connecting the two pulleys is determined to be 20π cm per second. This relationship between the pulleys is governed by the equation rω1 = Rω2, ensuring consistent motion across the belt. The calculations confirm the dynamics of the system involving both pulleys and the belt.
RobertoPink
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The two pulleys connected by a belt have a radii of 15 cm and 8 cm. The larger pulley rotates 24 times in 36 seconds.

a. Find the angular velocity of the small pulley in radians per second.

b. Find the linear velocity of a point on the belt that connects the two pulleys in centimeters per second.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RobertoPink said:
The two pulleys connected by a belt have a radii of 15 cm and 8 cm. The larger pulley rotates 24 times in 36 seconds.

a. Find the angular velocity of the small pulley in radians per second.

b. Find the linear velocity of a point on the belt that connects the two pulleys in centimeters per second.

(a) $r \omega_1 = R\omega_2$

$r = 8 \, cm$, $R = 15 \, cm$, $\omega_2 = \dfrac{2}{3} \, \text{rev per sec}$

you'll need to convert $\omega_2$ to radians per second

(b) note $v = r \omega_1 = R\omega_2$
 
The larger pulley has radius 15 cm so circumference $2\pi(15)= 30\pi$ cm. The larger pulley rotates 24 times in 36 seconds so at a rate of 24/36= 2/3 rotations per second. In one second, since the larger pulley has rotated 2/3 of a rotation, the belt has moved a distance or $(2/3)(30\pi)= 20\pi$ cm.

The smaller pulley has radius 8 cm so circumference $2\pi(8)= 16\pi$. When the belt moves $20\pi$ cm, it will have moved $\frac{16\pi}{20\pi}= \frac{4}{5}$ of one rotation of the smaller pulley. The smaller pulley is turning at 4/5 rotation per second. There are $2\pi$ radians in one rotation so that is a rate of $(4/5)(2\pi)= (8/5)\pi$ radians per second.

The linear velocity of the belt is the $20\pi$ cm/sec we got earlier.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top