How do you find the probabilities for an anharmonic quantum oscillator state?

In summary, finding the probabilities for an anharmonic quantum oscillator state involves determining the wave functions of the system, typically obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation for the anharmonic potential. One can use perturbation theory or numerical methods to approximate the energy levels and eigenstates. The probabilities are then calculated by taking the square of the absolute value of the wave functions, which represent the likelihood of finding the particle in various states. Additionally, one may analyze the system's behavior through transition probabilities and expectation values to gain further insights into the dynamics of the oscillator.
  • #1
damarkk
8
2
Homework Statement
Find the probability for all possible unperturbed states ##| n\rangle## for an harmonic oscillator with perturbation ##V(x)=\alpha x^3##
Relevant Equations
##x##, ##p##.
I have one tremendous doubt about it.


On ##t=0## the state of the oscillator is ##| \Psi (t) \rangle = | 1 \rangle ##. The perturbation is ##V(x)=\alpha x^3 = \alpha (\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega})^{3/2} (a+a^{\dagger})^3 = \gamma (a^3+3Na+3Na^{\dagger} + 3a + (a^{\dagger})^3)##.

The only possible other states are ##|0 \rangle##, ##| 2\rangle##, ##|4\rangle##. The state corrected on the first order is:

##|\Psi \rangle = |1 \rangle + c_0|0 \rangle + c_2|2 \rangle + c_4|4\rangle##

where ##c_k = \langle k| V(x) | 1 \rangle ##.


What are the probability to find the oscillator in a generic state ##|n \rangle##?


My answer is ##P_k = |c_k|^2##, but for k=1 we have ##P_1 = 1##. This is not possible I think. On the other hand, I suppose that ##P_1 = 1-P_0 - P_2- P_4 = 1-|c_0|^2-|c_2|^2-|c_4|^2##, but how can I show this? The coefficient of ##| 1\rangle## is 1. This is my question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
damarkk said:
Homework Statement: Find the probability for all possible unperturbed states ##| n\rangle## for an harmonic oscillator with perturbation ##V(x)=\alpha x^3##
Relevant Equations: ##x##, ##p##.

On ##t=0## the state of the oscillator is ##| \Psi (t) \rangle = | 1 \rangle ##.
How do you know the state is ##|1\rangle## at ##t = 0##? This was not given in the homework statement as given. Always provide the full homework statement.

I don't understand "##x##, ##p##" for your Relevant Equations.
damarkk said:
The perturbation is ##V(x)=\alpha x^3 = \alpha (\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega})^{3/2} (a+a^{\dagger})^3 = \gamma (a^3+3Na+3Na^{\dagger} + 3a + (a^{\dagger})^3)##.

The only possible other states are ##|0 \rangle##, ##| 2\rangle##, ##|4\rangle##. The state corrected on the first order is:

##|\Psi \rangle = |1 \rangle + c_0|0 \rangle + c_2|2 \rangle + c_4|4\rangle##

where ##c_k = \langle k| V(x) | 1 \rangle ##.
Your expression for ##c_k## doesn't have the correct dimensions. Did you leave out something?

damarkk said:
What are the probability to find the oscillator in a generic state ##|n \rangle##?


My answer is ##P_k = |c_k|^2##, but for k=1 we have ##P_1 = 1##. This is not possible I think. On the other hand, I suppose that ##P_1 = 1-P_0 - P_2- P_4 = 1-|c_0|^2-|c_2|^2-|c_4|^2##, but how can I show this? The coefficient of ##| 1\rangle## is 1. This is my question.
From ##|\Psi \rangle = |1 \rangle + c_0|0 \rangle + c_2|2 \rangle + c_4|4\rangle##, you can see that ##|\Psi \rangle## is not normalized.

That's ok. The probability ##P_k## is then ##|c_k|^2/\langle \Psi |\Psi \rangle##.
 

FAQ: How do you find the probabilities for an anharmonic quantum oscillator state?

What is an anharmonic quantum oscillator?

An anharmonic quantum oscillator is a quantum mechanical system that deviates from the simple harmonic oscillator model due to the presence of non-linear terms in its potential energy. Unlike the harmonic oscillator, which has a quadratic potential, an anharmonic oscillator can have potential terms that are cubic or higher in displacement, leading to different energy level spacings and behavior.

How do you derive the energy levels of an anharmonic oscillator?

The energy levels of an anharmonic oscillator can be derived using perturbation theory or by solving the Schrödinger equation for the specific potential. Commonly, the potential is expressed in a Taylor series expansion around the equilibrium position, and the first few terms are considered. The resulting energy eigenvalues can be approximated using numerical methods or analytical techniques such as the WKB approximation.

What is the role of the anharmonicity parameter?

The anharmonicity parameter quantifies the degree of deviation from harmonic behavior. It is typically introduced in the potential energy function and affects the spacing between energy levels. A larger anharmonicity leads to more significant deviations from the harmonic oscillator's energy level spacing, which can impact the probabilities of finding the system in various quantum states.

How do you calculate the probabilities for different states of an anharmonic oscillator?

The probabilities for different quantum states of an anharmonic oscillator can be calculated using the square of the absolute value of the wave function for those states. The wave functions can be found by solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the anharmonic potential. Once the wave functions are obtained, the probability of finding the oscillator in a particular state is given by the integral of the square of the wave function over the relevant spatial domain.

What numerical methods are commonly used to analyze anharmonic oscillators?

Common numerical methods for analyzing anharmonic oscillators include the finite difference method, the shooting method, and matrix diagonalization. These techniques allow for the approximation of wave functions and energy levels by discretizing the problem and solving the resulting equations. Additionally, variational methods can be employed to find approximate solutions by optimizing trial wave functions.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
637
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
585
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top