Another Interesting Putnam Integral.

In summary: I proposed.In summary, the conversation is about exploring two different ways to solve a given integral using the "differentiation under the integral sign" rule. The first way, involving the substitution $u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x$, results in a constant value of $\frac{\pi}{4}$ for all values of $a$. The second way, involving the derivative of the integral, results in a more complicated expression that cannot be easily solved. Other suggestions or methods for solving the integral are also discussed, including a link to a previous discussion on the same problem. The conversation ends with the speaker asking for further insights and solutions using the "differentiation under the integral
  • #1
Amad27
412
1
Helllo,

I have found another interesting integral from the old Putnam's.

Please ONLY use the "differentiation under the integral sign" rule for this one, after we have done that we can explore other possibilities. I really want to try "differentiation under the integral sign" for this.

Problem:
-----------

$$\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{1}{1+((\tan\left({x}\right))^\sqrt{2}} \,dx $$

So first we need to explore what we can let be $$a$$ there are a few possibilities. $$\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{1}{1+(\tan\left({ax}\right))^\sqrt{2}} \,dx $$

OR

$$\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{1}{1+(\tan\left({x}\right))^a} \,dx $$

So in the end, we have two ways to go,

$$ I(a) = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{1}{1+(\tan\left({ax}\right))^\sqrt{2}} \,dx $$

$$ J(a) = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{1}{1+(\tan\left({x}\right))^a} \,dx $$$$I'(a)$$ is too complicated (checked on WolframAlpha) so it is not worth it.

The other option is $$J'(a)$$

$$J'(a) = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{-(\tan\left({x}\right))^a\cdot\ln\left({\tan\left({x}\right)}\right)}{((\tan\left({x}\right))^a+1)^2} \,dx $$

Which can be found easily by a combination of the quotient rule and log rules.

Here comes the problem... It is very tough to find the antiderivative. Just checked on WolframAlpha, I found out that WolframAlpha CANT even compute it! It runs out of "time"

Any other suggestions?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let

$\displaystyle J(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{dx}{1 + (\tan{x})^a}$.

The answer we seek is $J(\sqrt{2})$. If you use symmetry, you find readily that $J(a) = \frac{\pi}{4}$ for all $a$. But since you want differentiation

$\displaystyle J'(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\tan{x})^a \ln(\tan{x})}{[1 + (\tan{x})^a]^2}\, dx$.

Via the u-sub $u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x$, we have

$\displaystyle J'(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\cot{u})^a \ln(\cot{u})}{[1 + (\cot{u})^a]^2}\, du$

$\displaystyle = -\int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\tan{u})^a \ln(\tan{u})}{[1 + (\tan{u})^a]^2}\, du$

$\displaystyle = -J'(a)$.

Hence $J'(a) = 0$, which implies $J(a)$ is constant. Now

$\displaystyle J(0) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{du}{2} = \frac{\pi}{4}$.

Hence $J(\sqrt{2}) = J(0) = \frac{\pi}{4}$.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Euge said:
Let

$\displaystyle J(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{dx}{1 + (\tan{x})^a}$.

The answer we seek is $J(\sqrt{2})$. If you use symmetry, you find readily that $J(a) = \frac{\pi}{4}$ for all $a$. But since you want differentiation

$\displaystyle J'(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\tan{x})^a \ln(\tan{x})}{[1 + (\tan{x})^a]^2}\, dx$.

Via the u-sub $u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x$, we have

$\displaystyle J'(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\cot{u})^a \ln(\cot{u})}{[1 + (\cot{u})^a]^2}\, du$

$\displaystyle = -\int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\tan{u})^a \ln(\tan{u})}{[1 + (\tan{u})^a]^2}\, du$

$\displaystyle = -J'(a)$.

Hence $J'(a) = 0$, which implies $J(a)$ is constant. Now

$\displaystyle J(0) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{du}{2} = \frac{\pi}{4}$.

Hence $J(\sqrt{2}) = J(0) = \frac{\pi}{4}$.

HI,

Let's explore BOTH ways.

Euge said:
The answer we seek is $J(\sqrt{2})$. If you use symmetry, you find readily that $J(a) = \frac{\pi}{4}$ for all $a$. But since you want differentiation

How CAN you use symmetry? Tangent is an odd function, so it is "symmetric" with respect to the x-axis. This is interesting too. Can you give me some advice?

Next, we go to the differentiation.

Euge said:
$\displaystyle J'(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\tan{x})^a \ln(\tan{x})}{[1 + (\tan{x})^a]^2}\, dx$.

Via the u-sub $u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x$, we have

$\displaystyle J'(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\cot{u})^a \ln(\cot{u})}{[1 + (\cot{u})^a]^2}\, du$

$\displaystyle = -\int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\tan{u})^a \ln(\tan{u})}{[1 + (\tan{u})^a]^2}\, du$

$\displaystyle = -J'(a)$.

Hence $J'(a) = 0$, which implies $J(a)$ is constant. Now

$\displaystyle J(0) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{du}{2} = \frac{\pi}{4}$.

Hence $J(\sqrt{2}) = J(0) = \frac{\pi}{4}$.

I understand one part of this,

Euge said:
J'(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\tan{x})^a \ln(\tan{x})}{[1 + (\tan{x})^a]^2}\, dx$.

Via the u-sub $u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x$, we have

$\displaystyle J'(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\cot{u})^a \ln(\cot{u})}{[1 + (\cot{u})^a]^2}\, du$

When you substitution the u = $$\frac{\pi}{2} - x$$ you get the cotangents, that makes sense, the NEXT step is confusing. Somehow you have transformed cotangents into tangents again.

Euge said:
$\displaystyle = -\int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\tan{u})^a \ln(\tan{u})}{[1 + (\tan{u})^a]^2}\, du$

And also,

Euge said:
Hence $J(\sqrt{2}) = J(0) = \frac{\pi}{4}$.

I'm sorry for acting like a beginner but how did $J(\sqrt{2}) = J(0)$?

Thanks
 
  • #4
Hey Olok,(Smile)

This is one old problem from the High School Problem Of The Week section (http://mathhelpboards.com/potw-secondary-school-high-school-students-35/problem-week-108-april-21st-2014-a-10229.html) and I've included two answers provided by the participants in that problem and I hope you will gain some insights from them.:)

@Euge, I hope you don't mind me posting a link to refer the OP to seeing an old thread of mine in the POTW section, I just thought perhaps the OP wanted also to see other methods to solve for this problem and I'm by no means to hijack this thread from you.:eek:
 
  • #5
anemone said:
Hey Olok,(Smile)

This is one old problem from the High School Problem Of The Week section (http://mathhelpboards.com/potw-secondary-school-high-school-students-35/problem-week-108-april-21st-2014-a-10229.html) and I've included two answers provided by the participants in that problem and I hope you will gain some insights from them.:)

@Euge, I hope you don't mind me posting a link to refer the OP to seeing an old thread of mine in the POTW section, I just thought perhaps the OP wanted also to see other methods to solve for this problem and I'm by no means to hijack this thread from you.:eek:

You know, I thought that problem seemed familiar...:D Thanks for clearing it up for me. (Yes)
 
  • #6
anemone said:
Hey Olok,(Smile)

This is one old problem from the High School Problem Of The Week section (http://mathhelpboards.com/potw-secondary-school-high-school-students-35/problem-week-108-april-21st-2014-a-10229.html) and I've included two answers provided by the participants in that problem and I hope you will gain some insights from them.:)

@Euge, I hope you don't mind me posting a link to refer the OP to seeing an old thread of mine in the POTW section, I just thought perhaps the OP wanted also to see other methods to solve for this problem and I'm by no means to hijack this thread from you.:eek:

Hello,

Thank you, MarkFL's solution was very quick and useful.

The only issue is that it is not obvious. It is rather intuitive to make the $$ u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x$$ substitution.

I TRIED differentiation under the integral sign BECAUSE It is **NOT** intuitive, it is simply a method.

I will be grateful if anyone else can still answer the questions I asked Euge, to just use this method (of differentiation).
 
  • #7
Hi Olok,

Since you want to explore both approaches I mentioned, let me start with the non-differentiation method first. Multiplying the integrand of $J(a)$ by $\frac{(\cos{x})^a}{(\cos{x})^a}$, we get

$\displaystyle (a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\cos{x})^a}{(\cos{x})^a + (\sin{x})^a}\, dx$.

Via the u-sub $u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x$, we also have

$\displaystyle J(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\sin{u})^a}{(\cos{u})^a + (\sin{u})^a}\, du$.

Thus

$\displaystyle 2J(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\cos{x})^a + (\sin{x})^a}{(\cos{x})^a + (\sin{x})^a}\, dx = \frac{\pi}{2}$.

Dividing by two gives $J(a) = \frac{\pi}{4}$.

Now for your other questions. By symmetry, I was referring to the equation

$\int_0^b f(x) \, dx = \int_0^b f(b - x)\, dx$,

where $f$ is integrable on $[0, b]$. This was used in both methods.

You wanted to find out how I transformed cotangents to tangents in one of my steps. This was done using the relations $\cot{u} = \frac{1}{\tan{u}}$ and the log rule $\ln{\frac{1}{t}}= -\ln{t}$.

To answer your last question, the fact that $J$ is constant implies $J(\sqrt{2}) = J(0)$.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Euge said:
Hi Olok,

Since you want to explore both approaches I mentioned, let me start with the non-differentiation method first. Multiplying the integrand of $J(a)$ by $\frac{(\cos{x})^a}{(\cos{x})^a}$, we get

$\displaystyle (a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\cos{x})^a}{(\cos{x})^a + (\sin{x})^a}\, dx$.

Via the u-sub $u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x$, we also have

$\displaystyle J(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\sin{u})^a}{(\cos{u})^a + (\sin{u})^a}\, du$.

Thus

$\displaystyle 2J(a) = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\cos{x})^a + (\sin{x})^a}{(\cos{x})^a + (\sin{x})^a}\, dx = \frac{\pi}{2}$.

Dividing by two gives $J(a) = \frac{\pi}{4}$.

Now for your other questions. By symmetry, I was referring to the equation

$\int_0^b f(x) \, dx = \int_0^b f(b - x)\, dx$,

where $f$ is integrable on $[0, b]$. This was used in both methods.

You wanted to find out how I transformed cotangents to tangents in one of my steps. This was done using the relations $\cot{u} = \frac{1}{\tan{u}}$ and the log rule $\ln{\frac{1}{t}}= -\ln{t}$.

To answer your last question, the fact that $J$ is constant implies $J(\sqrt{2}) = J(0)$.

Hi there,

That was all very helpful, I have one simple question left.

Where did you find that

$$ \int_{0}^{b}f(x) \,dx = \int_{0}^{b}f(b-x) \,dx $$

In other words, how do you know this property is true? Where would you find this online?

The graph is symmetric with respect to what though? I mean does this apply for the y-axis?

That is all I need to know. Very nicely done!
 
  • #9
Hi Olok,

You just use the u-sub $u = b - x$ to get that result. There's no graph involved.
 
  • #10
Euge said:
Hi Olok,

You just use the u-sub $u = b - x$ to get that result. There's no graph involved.

Thanks =) We are done.
 

FAQ: Another Interesting Putnam Integral.

What is "Another Interesting Putnam Integral"?

"Another Interesting Putnam Integral" is a mathematical problem that was proposed in the William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition, an annual mathematics competition for undergraduate students in the United States and Canada. It is known for its difficulty and has become a popular topic among mathematicians and problem solvers.

What makes "Another Interesting Putnam Integral" so challenging?

The problem is challenging because it requires a combination of advanced mathematical knowledge, creative thinking, and problem-solving skills. It involves multiple mathematical concepts such as calculus, geometry, and algebra, and often requires a non-standard approach to reach the solution.

What is the history behind "Another Interesting Putnam Integral"?

The problem was first proposed in the 1983 Putnam competition by mathematician William Kahan. It has since appeared in the competition multiple times, with slight variations each time. Over the years, many mathematicians have attempted to solve it, but it remains unsolved to this day.

Are there any strategies or tips for solving "Another Interesting Putnam Integral"?

There is no one definitive strategy for solving the problem, but some tips that may be helpful include breaking the problem into smaller, more manageable parts, trying different approaches, and using known mathematical techniques and identities. It also helps to approach the problem with a clear and focused mindset.

Why is "Another Interesting Putnam Integral" still unsolved?

There are several possible reasons why the problem remains unsolved. It may be due to its high level of difficulty, the lack of a definitive strategy for solving it, or simply because it has not yet been approached from the right angle. It is also possible that the problem is deliberately designed to be unsolvable, as many problems in the Putnam competition are known for their difficulty and trickiness.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
662
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
758
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top