Another isometric imbedding problem

  • Thread starter radou
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the topic of equivalence relations and Cauchy sequences in a metric space. It defines a relation ~ between two sequences and a metric D on the set of all equivalence classes. The conversation then goes on to prove the properties of ~ and D and introduces the function h as an isometric embedding. The conversation also includes a discussion on the continuity of h and suggests a simpler approach to the proof.
  • #36
Yes, now you've shown that every metric space has a completion. The usual way to prove this is by exercise 9. The reason most textbooks prefer exercise 9 is because it can be easily generalized and because the completion is very easy to describe.

One can in fact also show that the completion is unique. This is actually a consequence of exercise 2.

Also note that [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex] is an incomplete metric space. It's completion is of course [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex]. And exercise 9 now gives a very easy idea of how to construct [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex]! Just take all Cauchy sequences of rational numbers...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
micromass said:
Also note that [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex] is an incomplete metric space. It's completion is of course [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex]. And exercise 9 now gives a very easy idea of how to construct [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex]! Just take all Cauchy sequences of rational numbers...

Wow, I never thought of it that way! Thanks!

Btw, basically, this doesn't strictly have much to do with topology, right? i.e. it's more about metric spaces...
 
  • #38
Yes, this is more analysis than topology. In fact, entire chapter 7 seems to be more about metric spaces than topology.

If you're going to study functional analysis, then you're going to see much of chapter 7 again. Specifically, the completion is very important in functional analysis! But you're correct, it's not really topology...
 
Back
Top