Another Spivak Calculus question

The other equation I was assuming was the one you wrote, |x + y + z| \le |x + (y + z)| \le |x| + (|y| + |z|).In summary, the given inequality |x + y + z| \le |x| + |y| + |z| is true by the triangle inequality, and equality holds if and only if all three variables are of the same sign. To prove this, it suffices to show that if all three variables are the same sign, then there is equality, and if just one of the variables has a different sign than the rest, then the LHS is not equal to the RHS. This can be proven by applying the
  • #1
fatedquest
4
0

Homework Statement


[tex]|x + y + z| \le |x| + |y| + |z|[/tex]. Indicate when the equality holds, and prove your statement.

Homework Equations


Answer in the books says it hold only when x, y, and z are all of the same sign.


The Attempt at a Solution


The value on the rhs of the eq will keep getting bigger as the absolute value of x, y and z are added. It doesn't matter if x, y or z are positive or negative

The value on the lhs will increase when the value of variable that is added is of the same sign and will decrease when the value is of the opposite sign.

So lhs=rhs when the value of all variables are of the same sign and lhs<rhs when just one of the value are of a opposite sign.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Reading between the lines, I believe your reasoning is mostly correct, although I would work harder to express it in a clearer way. The way you have it phrased is misleading. The value on the LHS doesn't need to decrease when I add a negative y to a positive x, if y is very, very negative. What matters is that it never becomes quite as large as the RHS. But why exactly?

The inequality as given is true by the triangle inequality. So, in order to prove the answer, you need only show two things. First, if all three variables are the same sign, then there is equality. You haven't explicitly stated this in your proof. Second, if just one of the variables has a different sign than the rest, then the LHS is not equal to the RHS. You may want to use the term "without loss of generality" and specify which variable has the different sign.

Strictly speaking, a complete answer to this question will also need to consider the case when some of the variables are equal to 0, which has no sign. This isn't difficult to do, but is something that you haven't considered.
 
  • #3
To prove the inequality, just apply the triangle twice. It will be an equality when all signs are equal, examine a special case and things will become clear. Set x=-y and this will show that |x|+|y|=0 which can't hold for general x & y
 
  • #4
Thanks for you help, but I'm still now clear on the question.

@ Tedjn. Yes, what I was trying to say was what you wrote in the second paragraph. By decrease I meant to say move away from the maximum value the lhs can achieve.

@ I understand the part where there will be an equality if all the signs are the same, but I don't see why [tex]|x| + |y| = 0[/tex] if x=-y . Wouldn't that just add up to [tex]2|y|[/tex] ? I mean if y=3, the |y|=3 and |-y|=|-3|=3 ?

So basically I should just write my proof working from the triangle inequality and considering the case where (y+z) is treated as one value

[tex]|x + y + z| \le |x + (y + z)| \le |x| + (|y| + |z|)[/tex]

From the triangle inequality I know that for equality to hold (y+z) must equal |y|+|z| and for that to happen y and z must be of the same sign.

And then consider the [tex] |x + (y + z)| \le |x| + (|y| + |z|)[/tex]. So x has to be the same sign as (y+z) for equality to hold.

And also from what I've worked out about the triangle inequality, if the sign is different, lhs will be less than rhs.

Is that how it goes?

Thank you for kindly helping me out.
 
  • #5
fatedquest said:
but I don't see why [tex]|x| + |y| = 0[/tex] if x=-y . Wouldn't that just add up to [tex]2|y|[/tex] ?
Yes, it would, which is why it's generally problematic for that to equal 0. Why is it zero? Well, that's obvious -- if you don't forget the other equation you're assuming.
 
  • #6
Sorry, I really can't figure out what's the other equation I'm assuming that will make the sum 0. Please help.
 
  • #7
Think of it like this, take x=-1,y=1 and z=1, then if it were equality then 1=3 which is not the case and equality would hold. Why are you so hung on on this any way? You know from the normal triangle inequality that [tex]|x+y|\leq |x|+|y|[/tex] with equality holding true if and only if x & y have the same sign right? If you can prove this for in usual triangle inequality then you're done, as all you do is apply the triangle equality twice and then at every stage you say equality holds for the same sign.
 
  • #8
Note that in general [tex]|x|+|y|\geq 0[/tex] with equality holding if and only if x=y=0.

Mat
 
  • #9
Thanks, hung_mat, I finally understand what you were trying to say.
 

FAQ: Another Spivak Calculus question

1. What is Spivak Calculus?

Spivak Calculus is a textbook written by mathematician Michael Spivak that covers the fundamentals of calculus. It is known for its rigorous and abstract approach to the subject, making it popular among theoretical mathematicians.

2. How is Spivak Calculus different from other calculus textbooks?

Spivak Calculus is known for its challenging exercises and proofs, as well as its emphasis on the foundations of calculus and its rigorous approach. Other textbooks may focus more on applications and real-world examples.

3. Is Spivak Calculus suitable for beginners?

Spivak Calculus is not typically recommended for beginners, as it assumes a strong foundation in mathematics and proof-writing. It is more commonly used by advanced undergraduate and graduate students.

4. What topics are covered in Spivak Calculus?

Spivak Calculus covers topics such as limits, differentiation, integration, series, and multivariable calculus. It also includes sections on topology and differential forms.

5. Is Spivak Calculus a good resource for self-study?

Spivak Calculus can be a challenging but rewarding resource for self-study. However, it is recommended to have some background in calculus before attempting to use this textbook for self-study.

Back
Top