Another time dilation question

Click For Summary
When a spaceship accelerates, its two synchronized clocks at opposite ends become out-of-sync due to the effects of time dilation and the inability of extended objects to remain Born rigid during acceleration. The clocks will not maintain synchronization after acceleration unless specific conditions are met. This phenomenon occurs because the acceleration affects the clocks differently, leading to a time discrepancy in the rest frame. The discussion emphasizes that careful synchronization and acceleration schemes are necessary to keep the clocks aligned. Overall, the fundamental principles of relativity dictate that synchronization is disrupted during acceleration.
PatPwnt
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Say we synchronize two clocks in a spaceship each at the opposite ends of the ship a length of x'. Now we accelerate the ship to a velocity v with respect the the initial rest frame. So now according to the rest frame. The clocks are out-of-sync by vx'/c^2. What exactly happened to the clocks when they were accelerating to make one of them ahead of the other in the rest frame? Or is this all wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good but ambiguous question.

An extended object, like a space ship, cannot remain Born rigid during acceleration. To avoid confusion I would advice to rephrase the question into:

Two test masses at rest with respect to each other with a radar distance of r accelerate at the same time (using Einstein's synchronization convention) with a proper acceleration a. After this acceleration is their radar distance still r and are their clocks in sync?
 
This old thread addresses exactly that question and has some equations and diagrams that should be helpful to you.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=216113

As a general rule the clocks will not still be synchronised after the acceleration except under some very careful set up acceleration schemes. Born rigid acceleration does not result in the clocks remaining synchronised and as Jennefir has aluded to, extended objects would not, as a rule, naturally undergo Born rigid acceleration unless every atom of the extended object had its own carefully synchronised rocket moter.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K